摘要
赛义德在福柯话语意义上理解东方主义,把东方学知识称为“东方学话语”,从而质疑其知识合法性,这是其东方主义文化批评理论的核心。赛义德解构东方主义的最大意义不是得出了什么结论,也不是提供一个可资借鉴的文化研究范式,而是以一种异常尖锐的方式提出了多元文化如何对话与共生等一系列问题。
Based on Faucault＇s ＂discourse＂, Edward W. Said defines orientalist as ＂orientalism discourse＂and queries its legitimacy,which is the very core of his thought of orientalism. Rather than a conclusion or a pattern for reference,the key significance of the deconstruction of orientalism made by Said doesn＇t lies in the series of decisive questions of how the coexistence and communication of multiculture.
出处
《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2006年第6期906-909,共4页
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
