摘要
“《管子》四篇”存在着明显的“实化”精神、“虚化”政治的问题,这一问题与中国“借思想、文化以解决问题”的政治思想传统完全契合。本文着重辨析了“《管子》四篇”将老子之“道”往实际政治的方向引领所引发的一系列问题,“《管子》四篇”中所表现出的君主专制思想因素,也将“《管子》四篇”对政治活动中精神作用的夸大与其他思想进行了比较。
The author holds that Guanzi falters in overstating the function of spiritual cultivation while understating the function of politics, which is in correspondence with the conventional Chinese view of “solving political problems through spiritual and cultural means”. Its use of the concept of Dao initiated by LAO Zi in political discussions causes many misunderstandings,and its over-positive appraisal of despotism also has many adverse consequences for later generations.
出处
《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期43-48,共6页
Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）
