摘要
反恐措施对刑事诉讼领域的入侵,对程序正义和人权保障提出了前所未有之挑战。监听、搜查、羁押、司法审查、法庭审判、证据规则等刑事诉讼基本制度受到猛烈冲击并对人权保障产生直接影响。美国的反恐怖立法及其司法实践的变革,成为全球的焦点,也成为该领域的典型范例。这种变革的背后是深层价值选择,是正义和功利之间的博弈引领美国反恐怖立法和司法的走向,而尊严价值的勃兴为程序正义的重新抬头奠定了理念基础。我国刑事诉讼理念更新和立法完善应当引以为鉴,对恐怖犯罪作出合理的反应。在平衡理念之下,程序正义的内在价值决不能向打击犯罪的功利需求轻易低头。
Counter - terrorism measures invading into the field of criminal procedure is an unprecedented challenge for due process and human rights protection. A furious impact has been left on the basic criminal procedural system, including wiretap, search, detention, judicial review, tribunal and evidence rule, and human rights protection is also under its direct influence. The change of the American counter - terrorism law and criminal justice practice have been a focus in the world and a typical example in this field. There is a deep value choosing under this change. The fighting between justice and utility has a decisive role in the direction of the reform of the American counter - terrorism law and justice. The rise of the dignitary theory is the ideal basis of the renaissance of due process. As to the criminal procedure law amendement and ideas renewing of China, a lesson should be learned from this by giving reasonable response to terrorism crimes. Under the balance theory, the inner value of due process can not yield to the utilitarian requirement easily.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期129-143,共15页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
反恐措施
刑事诉讼
正义
功利
尊严价值
Counter - terrorism Measures
Criminal Procedure
Justice
Utility
Dignitary Value
