期刊文献+

经尿道前列腺电汽化切除术治疗高龄高危患者的临床观察 被引量:10

Transurethral electrovaporization of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia in senile and high risk patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估经尿道前列腺电气化切除术治疗高龄、高危患者的安全性及疗效。方法回顾性分析经尿道前列腺电气化切除术治疗的138例80岁以上高危良性前列腺增生症(benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH)患者的临床资料。结果138例患者手术时间32—68min(平均42min)。电切前列腺组织42~155g(平均76g);术中失血9—185ml(平均38m1)。术中未发生经尿道电切综合征、大出血。国际前列腺症状评分(international prostatic symptom score,IPSS)平均值由术前34.8降到7.5,平均Qmax由6.89ml/s增加至15.67ml/s。随访3~72个月,平均16.8个月。全部病例术后均排尿通畅。所有患者术后均未有心、脑、肝、肾等系统疾病加重。结论只要术前积极控制并发症,医师技术娴熟,经尿道前列腺电气化切除术是当今治疗80岁以上高危BPH的安全、有效的方法。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate(TUVP) in senile and high risk patients of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods The clinical data of 138 senile and high risk BPH patients treated by TUVP were analysed retrospectively. Results Mean weight of resected tissue was 76 ( range 42 - 155 ) g and mean operation time was 42 ( range 32 - 68) min. The blood loss during operation was 9 - 185 ( average 38 ) ml. Postoperative mean maximal urinary flow rate was significantly increased, and the mean international prostatic symptom score (IPSS) was significantly decreased. The follow-up period was 3 -72 months and all patients could pass urine smoothly. The preoperative concurrent diseases of heart, brain, liver and kidney etc. were not aggravated after TUVP operation. Conclusion TUVP can be applied to senile( ≥80 years old) and high risk BPH patients with safety and satisfied efficacy.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期173-175,共3页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
关键词 前列腺增生症 经尿道前列腺电气化切除术 benign prostatic hyperplasia transurethral electrovaporization of prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Berry S J, Coffey D S, Walsh P C, et al. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age[J]. J Urol, 1984, 132(3) : 474- 479.
  • 2Disantostefano R L, Biddle A K, Lavelle J P. The long-term cost effectiveness of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia[ J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2006, 24(2) : 171 - 191.
  • 3Minardi D, Galosi A B, Yehia M, et al. Transurethral resection versus minimally invasive treatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia : results of treatments. Our experience[ J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2004, 76( 1 ) :11 -18.
  • 4Leveillee R J. Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery[ J]. J Urol, 2006,176( 1 ) : 415.
  • 5Kaplan S A, Te A E. Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate:a novel method for treating men with benign prostatic hyperplasia[ J].Urology, 1995, 45(4) : 566 -572.
  • 6Talic R F, AI-Rikabi A C. Transurethral vaporization-resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral prostatectomy: comparative changes in histopathological features of the resected specimens [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2000, 37(3) : 301 -305.
  • 7曾子健,康颂东,陈新辉.经尿道电汽化术联合电切术治疗前列腺增生症(附46例报告)[J].中国内镜杂志,2003,9(12):41-42. 被引量:8

二级参考文献4

共引文献7

同被引文献62

引证文献10

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部