期刊文献+

城市公共开敞空间中的声景语义细分法分析的跨文化研究(英文) 被引量:11

A cross-cultural semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过一系列问卷调查, 运用语义细分法, 对两个在英国谢菲尔德、两个在中国北京的四个城市公共开敞空间进行了比较研究, 旨在找出城市公共开敞空间中声景的决定因子。研究发现, 尽管城市公共开敞空间中的声景评价很复杂, 但仍有四个主要的决定性因子: 放松、交流、空间性和动态性。这四个因子在中英的案例中很相似, 不过就因子的顺序及各因子所包含的评价指标而言, 两国之间尚有一定差异。有趣的是, 这些因子涵盖了设计城市公共开敞空间声学的主要层面: 功能( 放松和交流) 、空间和时间。不过, 这四个因子仅覆盖了总变量的约 50-60%, 由此显示了城市公共开敞空间中声景的复杂特点。对不同季节及不同广场的数据进行的分析表明, 上述四个决定因子仍然明显。另外, 从对英国和中国广场的声景评价中均可看出, 即使人们在公共开敞空间中感到很吵闹, 而声舒适程度仍然可能较高, 除非广场由高声级的、令人不快的声音所主导, 例如交通噪声。 A series of comparative field surveys were carried out in four urban open public spaces, two in Sheffield, UK and two in Beijing, China. The semantic differential method was applied to determine key factors that characterise the soundscape. It has been shown that whilst the soundscape evaluation in urban open public spaces is rather complicated, it is still possible to identify several major factors, including relaxation, communication, spatiality and dynamics, and these factors are common for both UK and Chinese situations, although in terms of the order of factors and the indices included in each factor there are differences between the two countries. It is interesting that these four factors cover the main facets of designing the acoustics of an urban open public space: function (relaxation and communication), space, and time, although the typical coverage of the total variance is only about 50-60%, indicating the complicated features of soundscapes of urban open public spaces. Analyses based on individual seasonal periods and individual case study sites show that the above four factors can still be identified. The general soundscape evaluation shows that both in the UK and China, although people may feel the sound environment is noisy/loud, they could stiU find it acoustically comfortable, unless a site is dominated by high level unpleasant sounds such as traffic.
作者 张玫 康健
出处 《声学技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期523-532,共10页 Technical Acoustics
关键词 声景 城市 公共开敞空间 语义细分法 文化 soundscape urban open public space semantic differential analysis culture
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1康健,杨威.城市公共开放空间中的声景[J].世界建筑,2002(6):76-79. 被引量:128
  • 2ZHANG M,KANG J.Towards the evaluation,description and creation of soundscape in urban open spaces[J].Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,accepted for publication.
  • 3ZHANG M,KANG J.Evaluation of urban soundscape by future architects[J].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2004,115:2497.
  • 4Schafer R M.The Tuning of the World[M].New York:Kn-opf,1977.
  • 5de Ruiter E.Reclaiming land from urban traffic noise impactzones-The great canyon[D].Technical University of Delft,The Netherlands,2004.
  • 6KANG J.Urban Sound Environment[M].London:Taylor & Francis incorporating Spon,2006.
  • 7KANG J,ZHANG M.Semantic differential analysis on the soundscape of urban open public spaces[J].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2002,112:2435.Also in the Proceedings of the First Pan-American Iberian Meeting on Acoustics,Cancun,Mexico,2002,publi-shed by the IBEROAMERICANA DE ACúSTICA,1-4.
  • 8Osgood C E,Suci G J,Tannenbaum P H.The measurement of meaning[M].Urbana:University of Illinois Press,1957.
  • 9Kuwano S,Namba S.Dimension of sound quality and their measurement[A].Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Acoustics[C].Rome,Italy,2001.
  • 10Zeitler A,Hellbrtck J.Semantic attributes of environmental sounds and their correlations with psychoacoustic magnitudes[A].Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Acoustics[C].Rome,Italy,2001.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Kuwano, S. & Namba, S. Dimension of sound quality and their measurement. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA).2001.
  • 2Fastl.H. Neutralizing the meaning of sound for sound quality evoluation. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA).2001.
  • 3Tamura, A, An environmentalindex based on inhabitants' recognition of sounds. Noise Effects 98: Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Noise asa Public Health Probiem,556- 559.1998,
  • 4Zwicker, E. & Fastl, H. Psychoacoustics: facts and models.2nd ed. Berlin: Springer. 1999.
  • 5Raimbault, M., B, rengier, M. & Dubois,D.Common factors In the Identification of urban soundscapes pilot study in two French cities:Lyon and Nantes. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA). 2001.
  • 6Blauert, J. & Jekosch, U, Sound-quality evaluation - A multi-layered problem. Acustical acta acustica, 83, 747-753, 1997.
  • 7Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum P, H The measurement of meaning. Urbana:University Press of Illinois.1957.
  • 8Soto.T., Yano, T., Yamashita, T., Kawai, K.,Rylander, R., Bjoerkman, M. & Oehrstroem, E,Cross-cultural comparison of communlty responses to road traffic noise in Gothenburg,Sweden, and Kumamoto, Japan, Part Ⅱ: Casuai modelling by path analysis", Noise Effects 98:Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, 565- 568.1998.
  • 9Maffiolo, V., Castellengo, M. & Dubais, D.Qualitative judgements of urban soundscapes.Proceedings of Internoise 99,1251 - 1254,1999.
  • 10Tsal, K. T, & Lai, P, R, The research of the interactions between the environmental sound and sight. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA). 2001.

共引文献127

同被引文献125

引证文献11

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部