期刊文献+

论公共健康与药品专利强制许可 被引量:12

On Public Health and the Compulsory License for Medicine Patent
下载PDF
导出
摘要 禽流感在全球的蔓延给人类的生命健康亮起红灯,同时也再次引起学术界对公共健康与药品专利强制许可问题的热烈讨论。面对作为私权的药品专利和作为人权的公共健康,不仅关系到法律制度层面的问题,而且涉及社会历史、政治经济、文化传统等许多层面。如果缺乏对这种复杂关系的深刻理解和正确把握,则不能确立科学合理地解决这种矛盾的原则和方式。 The worldwide spread of bird flu gives a warning to mankind and causes the scholars involved to have a heated discussion again on the issues concerning public health and the compulsory license for medicine patent. The relationship between medicine patent as individual right and public health as human rights is connected not only to the legal system but also to the given society, history, politics, economy, culture and tradition. The scientific and rational treating of the conflicts is based on the workable principles and approaches as well as a good understanding of their complicated relationship. Through a study of the practice of other countries in terms of society, history, politics, economy, philosophy and legal system, this paper aims to reveal the nature and decisive factors of their relationship and to provide the basic principles and legal approaches.
作者 曲三强
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期22-28,共7页 Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 禽流感 强制许可 药品专利 公共健康 bird flu compulsory license medicine patent public health
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1TRIPs协议第27条第1款.
  • 2郑成良.《论法治理念与法律思维》,载刘瀚、公丕祥主编.《21世纪的亚洲与法律发展》(上卷),南京师范大学出版社,2001年12月第1版,第259页.
  • 3World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2001, 144 (WHO 2000).
  • 4UNAIDS, Report on the Global HIV/AIDS Epidemic 125, 129, 133 (UNAIDS 2000), http.//www.unaids . org / epidemid- update/report /Epi- report . pdf .
  • 5Ellent Hoen,TRIPS,Pharmaoeutical Patents,and Acoess to Essential Medicines:A Long Way From Seattle to Doha,http://www.acoessmed-msf.org/uploed/PressClips/24620021440503/ChicagolawjoumalTRIPS.pdf.
  • 6http://www.wto.org.english.tratop-e/trips-e/factsheet-pharm03-e.htm.
  • 7Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Association of ,South Africa v President of the Republic of South Africa, Case No 4183/98.
  • 8OXFAM, South Africa vs. the Drug Giants - A Challenge to Affordable Medicines, available at http://www. oxdarn, org/eng/sa-court-case, pdf.
  • 9Brazil Medicines and Related Substances Control Amendment Act, No. 90, 1997.
  • 10OXFAM, South Africa vs. the Drug Giants - A Challenge to Affordable Medicines, http://www, oxfam. org/eng/sa-court-case, pdf.

共引文献66

同被引文献147

引证文献12

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部