期刊文献+

新斯的明试验改良结果判定法研究 被引量:26

Study on Revive Criteria for Neostigmine Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的改良原有新斯的明结果判定方法,为临床提供科学、准确、适用的评定方法以更好辅助重症肌无力(MG)临床诊断。方法对23例正常对照者及68例曾确诊为MG且病情出现反复的患者行新斯的明试验:甲基硫酸新斯的明1.5mg配以阿托品1.0mg肌肉注射,记录注射前及注射后每10min(直至注射后60min)的各项指标绝对评分及相对评分,并统计分析其阳性界定值的敏感性和特异性。结果以任一指标相对评分值超过60%为阳性标准,其敏感性和特异性分别达到88%、89%;25%~60%为可疑;小于25%为阴性标准,其敏感性和特异性分别达到89%、90%。结论该研究提供了客观、准确、简便、适用的新斯的明试验评定方法,为临床MG诊断提供了更为可靠的辅助手段。 Objective To revive the criteria for neoStigmine test, and prove a scientific, accurate, applicable method to help diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods Neostigmine (1.5 mg) and atropine (1.0 mg) were intramuscularly administered for 68 cases with clinical confirmed MG and 23 healthy control cases. The clinical absolute and relative scores of each item were recorded quantitatively before and every 10 minutes after intramuscular injection of neostigmine. Results The test result was positive when each item relative score was over 60%, 25%-60% was possible positive and under 25% was negative. Conclusions The criteria of neostigmine test established in this study is objective, accurate, easy and applicable for MG diagnosis.
出处 《中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志》 CAS 2007年第1期1-3,共3页 Chinese Journal of Neuroimmunology and Neurology
关键词 新斯的明试验 结果判定 重症肌无力 neostigmine test criteria myasthenia gravis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献7

  • 1王秀云,许贤豪,孙宏,韩雄,张华,国红.重症肌无力病人的临床绝对评分法和相对评分法[J].中华神经科杂志,1997,30(2):87-90. 被引量:241
  • 2许贤豪,神经免疫学,1992年,113页
  • 3许贤豪.神经免疫学[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1992.113.
  • 4AdamsRD,VictorM,RopperAH.PrinciplesofNeurology[M].McGram-HillCompaniesInc,1997.1459-1475.
  • 5FleissJL.Themeasurementofinterrateragreement[M].In:FleissJL.Statisticalmethodsforratesandproportions.NewYork:JohnWiley&Sons,1981.212-236.
  • 6LongstrethWTJr,KoepsellTD,vanBelleG.ClinicalNeuroepidemiology[J].ArchNeurol,1987,44:1091-1099.
  • 7AlpersBJ,Mancall.ClinicalNeurology[M].Philadelphia:F.A.DavisCompany,1971.944-951.

共引文献249

同被引文献195

引证文献26

二级引证文献560

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部