摘要
目的:调查、测评职业院校学生生活方式,并测试和分析其与心理健康的关系。方法:于2006-05整群随机分层抽取湖南环境生物职业技术学院医学、药学、护理3个医学专业系在校学生10个班级466名作为调查对象。采用梁静的健康生活方式测验量表改进版和症状自评量表(SCL-90)进行团体测评和比较分析。健康生活方式测验量表包括16个问题,每个问题有3个回答选项以供选择,每个选项得分为0,10,20,30分不等。此量表系在梁静生活方式测验量表的原则和基础上,根据学生的学习和生活特点,在个别问题和个别回答选项的词句表达上进行了适当的变更和调整。调整后未影响信度和效度。将“健康生活方式测验量表”16组问题的回答选项结果进行计分,16个得分数字相加即为健康评分总分。临床症状自评量表包含躯体化、强迫症状、人际关系、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性等10个因子共90个条目。结果:发放问卷466份,回收合格问卷450份,有效率96.57%。①70.67%学生的生活方式健康评分在280～<400分的较高分区,属非常健康、文明生活方式型;24.22%在160～<280分中游区,属黄灯警示生活方式型。②不同类别学生生活方式评分比较,男生与女生差异显著(333.4±51.9,305.5±56.7,P<0.05);城市生源高于农村生源,差异显著(314.4±56.2,297.4±56.5,P<0.05);不同年龄段比较和不同专业比较,差异均无显著性意义。③生活方式健康评分与SCL-90各因子均呈负相关(r=-0.246,-0.174,-0.190,-0.269,-0.282,-0.279,-0.201,-0.229,-0.236,P<0.01)。④与国内常模比较,生活方式健康评分<400分以下的学生躯体化、强迫症状、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性等8个因子分显著增加,差异显著(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论:有近1/4的学生生活方式健康红灯开始报警。生活方式文明健康状况与心理健康水平高度相关。
AIM： To investigate and evaluate the life style of vocational collage students, and test as wall as analyze its relationship with psychological health. METHODS： Randomized stratified clustering was adopted to select 466 students from 10 classes and 3 departmentsof medical sciences, pharmaceutical sciences and nursing in Hunan Vocational Collage of Environment and Biology in May 2006. Healthy Living Style Scale edited by Liang Jing and SCL-90 ware adopted to conduct group testing and comparing analysis. The Healthy Living Style Scale included 16 questions and there ware 3 answers for each question. Each answer was scored as 1, 10, 20 and 30 points respectively. This scale was designed by referring to the characteristics of learning and living based on the principle and basis of it, and the expressions of individual question as well as answer ware reformed and adjusted proparly without influencing the reliability and validity. The total score of Healthy Living Style Scale was obtained by summing up the scores of 16 items. SCL-90 was composed of 90 items in 10 factors, including somatization, compulsion, interpersonal relationship, depression, anxiety,, hostility, horror, bigoted and psychosis etc. RESULTS： A total of 466 questionnaires ware sent out, and 450 qualified questionnaires ware recollected with the effec6ve rate of 96.57%. ① The scores of 70.67% of students ware in a higher range of 280- 〈 400 points, which was considered as a healthy and civilized living-style, whereas 24.22% of students got a score ranged 160- 〈 280, which should be noticed. ② Comparison in score of life style among different students： it was greatly different between male students and female students, and the differences ware significant （333.4±51.9,305.5±56.7, P 〈 0.05）, and it was higher in urban students than that in countryside students, and the differences ware remarkable （314.4±56.2,297.4±56.5,P 〈 0.05）. However, there was no significant difference among students of different age and majors. ③ The score of Healthy Living Style Scale was in negative correlation with all factors in SCL-90 （r =-0.246, -0.174, -0.190, -0.269, -0.282, -0.279,-0.201 ,-0.229,-0.236, P 〈 0.01 ）. ④ Compared with domestic norm, students with the score of Healthy Living Style Scale 〈 400 points got increased scores in factors of somatization, compulsion, depression, anxiety, hostility, horror, bigoted and psychosis, and the differences was significant （P〈 0.05 or 0.01）. CONCLUSION： The living style of about a quarter students should be noticed and improved. The health condition of living style is highly correlated with the level of psychological health.
出处
《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第17期3291-3293,共3页
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
