摘要
民事诉讼中,事实推定作为法官认定案件事实的一种裁判方法,在司法实践中的应用范围比法律推定更为广泛。事实推定的三段论逻辑结构决定了它的基础事实必须达到甚至高于“高度盖然性”的证明标准,只有这样才能保证推定事实能够具有较高程度的盖然性。正确运用事实推定的前提之一就是准确地找出经验法则、基础事实与推定事实之间的连接点。实践中的事实推定面临着逻辑要求的严密性与运用结果的非同一性之间的矛盾,解开这个矛盾的方法就是将事实推定的适用条件落实在法律条文中、实行法官的心证公开、统一各院的裁判尺度。
As a measure of judging the facts in issue, the presumption of fact is practiced more widely than presumption of law in judicial areas. The structure of syllogism decides that the proving standard of basic fact must reach or exceed the ＂high probability＂. Only by this way can we guarantee the accuracy of the presumptive fact. One of the preconditions of presumption is to find precisely the point of junction between the basic fact, the presumptive fact and the rule of thumb. In judicial practices, the presumption of fact faces the contradiction between the strictness of syllogism and the dissimilarity of results. The way to solve this problem, in my view, can be proposed by regulating the qualification of presumption of fact in law, by opening the train of thoughts of judges to the public, by unifying the scale of judgments in all courts.
出处
《北京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2006年第4期55-59,共5页
Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
民事拆讼
事实推定
逻辑法则
三段论
civil action
presumption of fact
rule of logic
syllogism
