期刊文献+

四种肿瘤标志物诊断盆腔包块的临床应用价值 被引量:10

Clinical values of four markers in diagnosis of pelvic mass
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨CA125、CA199、CEA、AFP诊断女性盆腔包块的临床意义。方法收集盆腔包块住院病人208例,运用微粒子酶联免疫法(MEIA)测定术前1周血清CA125、CA199、CEA含量,采用放免法测定AFP含量。结果(1)盆腔恶性包块CA125、CA199水平均高于良性包块,尤其是CA125水平明显增高,良恶性包块中CA125的阳性率分别为36.3%、76%,差异有显著性。但CEA、AFP阳性率均较低。(2)子宫肌腺症、子宫内膜异位症CA125阳性率分别为74.4%、58.1%,均高于其它良性包块,差异有显著性。结论CA125是较理想的盆腔肿瘤标志物,CEA运用价值不大。 Aim To study the clinical value of CA125 , CA199, CEA and AFP in diagnosis of female pelvic mass. Method During one week before operation, the serum from 208 patients suffering from pelvic masses were assayed for CA125 , CA199 , CEA by Micropartical enzyme immunoassay(MEIA) and for AFP by radio immunoassay(RIA). Results ( 1 ) CA125 and CA199 were higher in malignant mass than in benign mass,particularly CA125 The CA199 positive rates in maligant mass and benign mass were 36.3% ,76.0% respectively,but CEA, AFP positive rates were low. (2) The CA125 positive rates in endometrioma and endometriosis were 74.36% ,58.14% respectively and were higher than else benign masses. So the CA125 had differential diagnosis value. Conclusion The CA125 is an appropriate marker in diffrentiating pelvic masses. Clinical value of CEA is limited.
作者 马俊勤
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2007年第1期56-57,共2页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 盆腔包块 CA125 CA199 CEA AFP pelvic mass CA125, CA199, CEA, AFP
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1NIH consensus conference,Ovarian cancer:Screening,treatment and followup.JAMA,1995,273:491.
  • 2马水清,沈铿,郎景和.恶性肿瘤风险指数在卵巢恶性肿瘤术前诊断中的作用[J].中华妇产科杂志,2001,36(3):162-164. 被引量:33
  • 3连利娟 胡秀风 刘文淑.卵巢癌单克隆抗体在诊断上的应用[J].中华妇产科杂志,1997,13(1):40-1.
  • 4Mario L,Jeff B.Preoperative CA125 levels in patients with Hereditary compared to sporadic epithelial ovarian carcinoma.Gynecol Oncol,2002,84(5):413-5.
  • 5连利娟 林巧稚.妇科肿瘤学(第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.564-565,720-722.
  • 6张辉,孔北华.肿瘤标志物在妇科肿瘤中的应用进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(1):9-13. 被引量:19

二级参考文献18

  • 1Giuseppe M,Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1999年,106卷,524页
  • 2Tingulstad S,Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1996年,103卷,826页
  • 3Gillis C R,Lancet,1991年,337卷,611页
  • 4Cole LA,Sutton JM. Selecting an appropriate HCG test for managing gestational trophoblastic disease and cancer[J]. Reprod Med, 2004, 49(7) :545-553.
  • 5Gadducci A, Ferdeghini M, Castellani C, et al. Serum macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) levels in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 1998, 70 ( 1 ) :111-114.
  • 6Stuart GC, Dawson LM. Update of granulosa cell tumours of the ovary[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2003,15 ( 1 ) :33-37.
  • 7Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer[ J ]. Lancet, 2002,359 ( 9306 ) :572-577.
  • 8Pras E, Willemse PH, Canrinus AA, et al. Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and CYFRA21-1 in cervical cancer treatment[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002,52( 1 ) :23-32.
  • 9Takeda A, Sakuragi N, Okamoto K, et al. Preoperative serum SCC, CA125, and CA19-9 levels and lymph node status in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2002, 81 (5) :451-457.
  • 10Beck EP, Wagner M, Anselmino L, et al. Is OVX1 a suitable marker for endometrial cancer[J] ? Gynecol Oncol, 1997, 65(2) :291-296.

共引文献62

同被引文献49

引证文献10

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部