摘要
拉卡托斯与夏平二人分别提出了两种风格迥异的科学编史学思想,引起了广泛的影响。二者的差异主要表现在科学史的内外史划分、社会学解释科学的恰当性以及科学史的研究语境等三个方面。我们认为,夏平的科学编史学思想超越了拉卡托斯,并在一定程度上代表了科学编史学的发展方向。
Lakatos and Shapin have put forward different historiography thoughts of science and brought profound influence.Their differences mainly lie in three aspects that are the demarcation of internal and external history of science,the appropriateness of sociological explanation of science and the study context of the history of science.The historiography thoughts of science of Shpain surpass those of Lakatos and represent the direction of historiography thoughts of science development.
出处
《科学技术与辩证法》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第1期93-95,109,共4页
Science Technology and Dialectics
基金
国家社会科学基金"科学大战与两种文化"(04BZX017)
