期刊文献+

掠夺性定价行为的异化及其竞争策略研究 被引量:2

The Dissimilation of Predatory Pricing and Competition Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在网络经济条件下,掠夺性定价行为的主体、掠夺条件、表现形式和实施效果都出现了异化,因此,针对掠夺性定价行为的竞争政策也需作相应调整,从效率与公平两个角度系统考量新经济条件下掠夺性定价行为,而不是简单地加以限制。 Under internet economy terms, predatory pricing behavioral subject, the implementary terms, form of expression and implementary effect appear dissimilation, so, correspondingly, it's necessary to adjust the competition policy of predatory pricing,under the condition of the new economy, the problem must be considered from two aspects of efficiency and fairness, not simply be restricted.
出处 《经济与管理》 2007年第3期78-81,共4页 Economy and Management
关键词 网络经济 掠夺性定价 竞争政策 intemet economy predatory pricing competition policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1John S.McGee,"Predatory Pricing Revisited",Journal of Law and Economics vol.23,1980,p.289-330.
  • 2Frank H.Easterbrook,"Predatory Strategies and Counterstrategies",University of Chicago Law Review vol.48,1981,p263-377.
  • 3Paul Milgrom & John Roberts,"Predation,Reputation and Entry Deterrence",Journal of Economic Theory vol.27,1982,p280-312.
  • 4David Kreps & Robert Wilson,"Reputation and Imperfect Information",Journal of Economic Theory vo1.27,1982,p253-279.
  • 5Garth Saloner,"Predation,Mergers and Incomplete Information",Rand Journal of Economics,vol.18,1987,p165-186.
  • 6Jean-Pierre Benoit,"Financially constrained entry in a game with incomplete information",Rand Joumal of Economics,vol.15 (4),1984,p 490-499.
  • 7Areeda & Turner,Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act,Harvard Law Review,Vol.88,1975,p697-733.
  • 8Brook Group LTD.v.Brown& Williamson Tobacco Corp.,509 U.S.209,1993.
  • 9AKZO Chemie BV v.Commission,Case C-62/86[1991]ECRI-3359,July 3,1993.

同被引文献28

  • 1岳中刚.双边市场的定价策略及反垄断问题研究[J].财经问题研究,2006(8):30-35. 被引量:78
  • 2BESSEN J. Holdup and licensing of cumulative innovations with pri- vate information [J]. Economics Letters, 2004 (82): 321-326.
  • 3Filistrucchi L., Geradin D. and van Damme E. Identifying Two-Sided Markets [J].World Competition 2013. vol. 36(1) :34.
  • 4Round Table on Two-Sided Markets-Note by the Delegation of the European Commission. Document no: DAF/COMP/WD (2009) 69 : 6.
  • 5Bernard Caillaud and Bruno Jullien, Chicken&Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers[J]. RAND Journal of Economics. 2003. Vol. 34(2): 309 -328.
  • 6Parker. G. G. and van Alstyne. M.W. Two-sided Network Effects: A Theory of Iinformation Product Design [J]. Management Science. 2005. vol. 51(10):1494-1504.
  • 7Wright Julian. One-Sided Logic in Two-Sided Markets[ J]. Review of Network Economics. 2004.3 ( 1 ) : 44 - 64.
  • 8Filistrucchi L. , Geradin D. and van Damme E. Identifying Two-Sided Markets [ J]. World Competition 2013. vol. 36(1):36.
  • 9Rochet J. and J. Tirole. Cooperation among competitors: some economics of payment card associations RAND Journal of Economics. 2002 (3) :549 - 570.
  • 10Joskow and Klevorick. A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy [ J]. Yale Law Journal. 1979 (89) : 213-270.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部