摘要
美国学派作为国际政治经济学的主流学派,在理论框架和分析基础上与国际关系学一脉相承,而以斯特兰奇为代表的英国批判学派则试图以国际政治经济研究整合经济与政治研究两个领域。基于对全球市场权力结构的分析,斯特兰奇较早地提出了全球化条件下国家与市场的关系这一关键研究课题。针对这一课题的研究要求主流学派拓展和丰富自己的分析基础,引入体系层次外以及理性主义框架以外的各种分析机制。而这一过程,有助于国际政治经济分析与比较政治经济分析的进一步融合,也有利于国际政治经济学进一步树立和加强自己的学科特征。
The study of international political economy started as a subfield and an empirical area of international relations in the United States, as opposed to the critical approach initially advanced by the British scholar Susan Strange who sought to subsume the two areas of economic and political studies under a consistent logic of international political economy. Although the two IPE approaches appear to have divergent analytical bases and intellectual ambitions, the crucial issue of state-market relations under globalization may constitute an empirical and conceptual link between the two traditions. The pursuit of this research program requires that IPE scholars continue to dismantle the discipline barriers between IPE and the other subfields of political science, such as comparative politics and comparative political economy, which, in turn, will help strengthen the analytical foundations of IPE studies as a distinctive academic area.
出处
《世界经济与政治》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期67-73,共7页
World Economics and Politics
