摘要
在当事人主义诉讼模式下,当事人本人陈述具有阐明案情和证明事实的功能。我国当事人陈述制度根植于客观真实证明标准和职权主义诉讼模式,缺失阐明案情的功能并且证明事实的功能极弱。随着我国民事诉讼模式的转换,重构当事人陈述制度势在必行。《第三稿》第十七章以价值分析方法构建的当事人陈述制度存在着严重的结构性缺陷。重构当事人陈述制度必须采取功能分析的方法,在此基础上建立听取当事人本人意见制度和当事人本人证言制度。
Under the lawsuit pattern of adversary system, party＇s statement has the function of expounding case and proving fact. The party＇s statement system of our country, which has only a weak function of proving fact, is rooted in the objective identification standard and the authority principle lawsuit pattern. With the conversion of the civil action system in our country, it is imperative to reconstruct the system. The chapter 17 of The Third Draft has serious structural defects found by the analytical method of value. Reconstructing the system must take the analytical method of function to construct the party＇s testimony system and the system of listening to party＇s opinion on this basis.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期161-168,F0003,共9页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
当事人陈述
阐明案情
证明事实
party＇s statement
expounding case
proving fact
