摘要
目的全面比较、评价当前全球以“循证(Evidence Based)”冠名的医学期刊,为我国同类期刊提高质量提供借鉴,为医学工作者和患者获取高质量临床证据和了解循证医学期刊概况提供参考。方法检索PubMed、EMbase、Ulrich's Periodicals Directory及万方数据库。收集所有以“Evidence Based”冠名的医学期刊,并各选2006年最后一期内容,用文献计量学方法进行分析。结果共纳入24种医学期刊,涉及临床、护理、卫生保健等12个学科;分布于6个国家,涵盖中、英文两个语种;期刊办刊目的、栏目设置、内容等相互之间既有交叉又有区别。结论循证医学类期刊的出版,快捷方便地为医学工作者提供了各自领域的最新进展和最佳证据,节约了读者获取和阅读信息的时间,并为我国循证医学期刊的发展提供了有益借鉴。
Objective To compare and review worldwide journals titled ＂evidence-based＂ in order to provide an overview of these healthcare journals and suggestions for improving the quality of this type of journal in China and to introduce a quick way for healthcare professionals and patients to obtain high quality clinical evidence. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Ulrich＇s Periodicals Directory, Wanfang and some relevant websites to identify journals titled ＂evidence-based＂. The last issues in 2006 of these kind of journals were analyzed by bibliometric method. Results Twenty-four journals were included. Covering 12 disciplines such as clinical, nursing, health care, etc. They were divided into the primary journals and the secondary journals, published in two languages in six countries. These journals had differences and similarities in their aims, columns and contents, etc. Conclusions Evidence-based medical journals provide the latest developments and the best evidence for healthcare professionals in their own fields, save their time in searching for and reading information, and provide ideas for improving the quality of similar journals in our country.
出处
《中国循证医学杂志》
CSCD
2007年第4期289-295,共7页
Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词
循证医学
期刊
文献计量学
Evidence-based medicine
Periodical
Bibliometfics
