期刊文献+

Sirolimus-eluting cobalt alloyed stents in treating patients with coronary artery disease:six-month angiographic and one-year clinical follow-up result A prospective,historically controlled,multi-center clinical study 被引量:8

Sirolimus-eluting cobalt alloyed stents in treating patients with coronary artery disease:six-month angiographic and one-year clinical follow-up result A prospective,historically controlled,multi-center clinical study
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background The emergence of drug-eluting stents (DES) has dramatically reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluUng cobalt-chrome stents (Firebird 2) for treating patients with coronary artery disease. Methods Sixty-seven patients with de novo or non-stented restenostic coronary lesions were chosen to receive the Firebird 2 stent as the final treatment (Firebird 2 group). Another 49 consecutive patients were implanted with bare cobalt alloyed stents (Driver, Medtronic) within the previous six months and served as historical controls (control group). Baseline clinical characteristics, angiographic features, procedural results, 30-day, 6-month and 12-month clinical follow-up regarding the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as well as the primary endpoint of late lumen loss at 6-month angiographic follow-up were compared between the two groups. Results The demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups despite more patients in the Firebird 2 group who underwent previous percutaneous coronary intervention (22.4% vs 8.2%, P=0.0418) and who had diabetes mellitus (29.9% vs 12.2%, P=0.0253). In the Firebird 2 group, the mean diameter of the reference vessel was smaller ((2.79±0.46) mm vs (2.98±0.49) mm, P=0.0175) and more stents were implanted for each lesion (1.28±0.52 vs 1.10±0.30, P=0.0060). Other angiographic, procedural results and the device success rate were similar between the two groups. The MACE rate at 30-day and 3-month was the same, but significantly fewer MACE occurred in the Firebird 2 group at 6- and 12-month follow-up (1.5% vs 12.2% at 6 month, P=0.0168; 1.5% vs 26.5% at 12 month, P〈0.0001). The primary endpoint of late lumen loss at 6-month angiographic follow-up was significantly reduced in the Firebird 2 group (in-stent: (0.05±0.09) mm vs (0.98±0.61) mm; in-segment: (0.05±0.18) mm vs (0.72±0.59) mm; P〈0.0001) than the control group. One patient in the Firebird 2 group had in-segment restenosis (1.3%) while the rate in the control group (38.1%) was significantly higher, P〈0.0001. Intravascular ultrasound examination was performed in 70.1% of patients in the Firebird 2 group and revealed that the percentage of volumetric obstruction was (1.26±1.05) %. No stent thrombosis was observed in either group at 12-month follow-up. Conclusion The Firebird 2 sirolimus-eluting cobalt alloyed stent is safe and feasible in treating patients with coronary artery disease. Background The emergence of drug-eluting stents (DES) has dramatically reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluUng cobalt-chrome stents (Firebird 2) for treating patients with coronary artery disease. Methods Sixty-seven patients with de novo or non-stented restenostic coronary lesions were chosen to receive the Firebird 2 stent as the final treatment (Firebird 2 group). Another 49 consecutive patients were implanted with bare cobalt alloyed stents (Driver, Medtronic) within the previous six months and served as historical controls (control group). Baseline clinical characteristics, angiographic features, procedural results, 30-day, 6-month and 12-month clinical follow-up regarding the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as well as the primary endpoint of late lumen loss at 6-month angiographic follow-up were compared between the two groups. Results The demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups despite more patients in the Firebird 2 group who underwent previous percutaneous coronary intervention (22.4% vs 8.2%, P=0.0418) and who had diabetes mellitus (29.9% vs 12.2%, P=0.0253). In the Firebird 2 group, the mean diameter of the reference vessel was smaller ((2.79±0.46) mm vs (2.98±0.49) mm, P=0.0175) and more stents were implanted for each lesion (1.28±0.52 vs 1.10±0.30, P=0.0060). Other angiographic, procedural results and the device success rate were similar between the two groups. The MACE rate at 30-day and 3-month was the same, but significantly fewer MACE occurred in the Firebird 2 group at 6- and 12-month follow-up (1.5% vs 12.2% at 6 month, P=0.0168; 1.5% vs 26.5% at 12 month, P〈0.0001). The primary endpoint of late lumen loss at 6-month angiographic follow-up was significantly reduced in the Firebird 2 group (in-stent: (0.05±0.09) mm vs (0.98±0.61) mm; in-segment: (0.05±0.18) mm vs (0.72±0.59) mm; P〈0.0001) than the control group. One patient in the Firebird 2 group had in-segment restenosis (1.3%) while the rate in the control group (38.1%) was significantly higher, P〈0.0001. Intravascular ultrasound examination was performed in 70.1% of patients in the Firebird 2 group and revealed that the percentage of volumetric obstruction was (1.26±1.05) %. No stent thrombosis was observed in either group at 12-month follow-up. Conclusion The Firebird 2 sirolimus-eluting cobalt alloyed stent is safe and feasible in treating patients with coronary artery disease.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2007年第7期533-538,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 instrumentation coronary angiography SIROLIMUS STENTS treatment outcome instrumentation coronary angiography sirolimus stents treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1SHAFIQ N,MALHOTRA S,PANDHI P,GROVER A,UBOWEJA A.A META-ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL TRIALS OF PACLITAXEL- AND SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS IN PATIENTS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE[].British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.2005
  • 2Ong AT,Serruys PW,Aoki J,et al.The unrestricted use of paclitax-el-versus sirolimus-eluting stent for coronary artery disease in an un-selected population:one-year results of the Taxus-Stent Evaluated atRotterdam Cardiology Hospital(T-SEARCH)registry[].Journal of the American College of Cardiology.2005
  • 3Simonton CA,Brodie BR,Wilson BH.Drug-eluting stents for emerging treat-ment strategies in complexlesions[].Rev Cardiolvasc Med.2005
  • 4Holmes DR Jr,Leon MB,Moses JW,et al.Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis[].Circulation.2004
  • 5Lemos PA,Serruys PW,van Domburg RT,et al.Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the "real world": the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry[].Circulation.2004
  • 6Stone GW,Ellis SG,Cox DA,et al.A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease[].New England Journal of Homeopathy.2004
  • 7Stone GW,Ellis SG,Cox DA,et al.One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-IV trial[].Circulation.2004
  • 8Smith SC,Dove JT,Kern MJ,et al.ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 g[].Journal of the American College of Cardiology.2001
  • 9Moses JW,Leon MB,Popma JJ,et al.Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery[].New England Journal of Homeopathy.2003
  • 10Stone GW,Ellis SG,Cox DA,et al.A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease[].New England Journal of Homeopathy.2004

共引文献41

同被引文献26

引证文献8

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部