摘要
德国奥特克公司向我国法院申请承认与执行由临时仲裁庭在伦敦做出的仲裁裁决的案例,不仅涉及临时仲裁机构裁决的法律效力及其在我国的承认与执行问题,还涉及包括临时仲裁机构与常设仲裁机构裁决的效力、含有仲裁条款的合同与仲裁协议的成立时间、仲裁条款独立原则在仲裁与审判实践中的解释以及如何确定国际商事仲裁程序的适用法律等有关仲裁的基本理论与实践问题。对这些问题的探究有助于解决临时仲裁庭仲裁裁决在我国的承认与执行问题。
The recognizability and enforcement of ad hoc arbitral award made in London by the Chinese People＇s Court from Aoetker case involves the basic theoretical and practical issues in arbitration law, including the binding force of the award made by special ad hoc tribunal and that under the administration of the permanent arbitration institutions, formation of the arbitration agreement and the main contract with arbitration clause, the interpretation on the sevembility doctrine of the arbitration clause in the adjudication practices, as well as the determination of the applicable law for the international commercial arbitration procedure after comparative study on the basic theories and practices in the field of international commercial arbitration. The issues help to solve the question of the recognizability and enforcement of foreign ad hoc arbitral award in China.
出处
《政法论丛》
2007年第3期22-28,共7页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
临时仲裁机构裁决
承认与执行
仲裁务款独立原则
仲裁程序适用法律
ad hoc arbitral award
recognizability and enforcement
sevembility doctrine of arbitration clause
applicable law for international arbitration procedure
