摘要
目的:比较MEBO和SD-Ag对面、颈部烧伤的疗效。方法:将2000年9月～2006年9月收治的142例面、颈部烧伤患者,随机分为湿润烧伤膏治疗组(称MEBO治疗组)和磺胺嘧啶银悬液对照组(SD -Ag对照组),MEBO治疗组64例,SD-Ag对照组78例。结果:MEBO较SD-Ag在治疗面、颈部烧伤时,在促进创面愈合,减轻疼痛,抗感染,减少瘢痕形成等方面有明显优势。结论:治疗面、颈部烧伤时MEBO优于SD-Ag。
Objective： To compare the efficacy of MEBO and SD - Ag Cream in treating faciocervical burn wounds. Method： 142 cases of faeiocervical burn entered our hospital during the period from September 2000 to September 2006. The patients were divided in random into 2 groups. In one group, 64 eases were treated with MEBO and in the other group, 78 eases were treated with SD - Ag Cream. Result： MEBO was superior to SD - Ag Cream in terms of promoting wound healing, relieving pain, reducing sear formation and preventing infection. Conclusion： For treating faeioeervieal burn, MEBO is superior to SD - Ag Cream.
出处
《中国烧伤创疡杂志》
2007年第2期121-123,共3页
The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
