期刊文献+

试论我国国家目标与研究自由的矛盾冲突及解决对策 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学家个人自由不是绝对的,而是相对的,它与社会责任相伴而生。以此理论视角分析目前我国科学研究的国家目标和研究自由的现实关系,指出存在的矛盾冲突,并试图作出对这一问题的对策思考。
作者 马佰莲
出处 《中国科技论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第6期110-114,共5页 Forum on Science and Technology in China
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献40

  • 1赵佳苓.科学的角色与体制化[J].自然辩证法通讯,1987,9(6):35-41. 被引量:5
  • 2高昌林.基础科学面向国家目标──美国科技政策的新趋势[J].中国科技论坛,1994(6):63-64. 被引量:3
  • 3威廉·J·克林顿 小阿伯特·戈尔.科学与国家利益[M].科学技术文献出版社,1999..
  • 4[1]Michael Polanyi. The republic of science: its political and economic theory[A]. Edward Shills. Criteria for Scientific Development: Publich Policy and National Goals[C]. The M.I.T.Press, 1968:1-21.
  • 5[2]Vannevar Bush. Science: The Endless Frontier[M]. Washington: National Science Foundation, 1960:19.
  • 6[3]Harvey Broods. The evolution of U.S.science policy[A]. Bruce L.R.Smith and Claude Earfield. Technology, R&D, and the economy[C]. Wastington: Brookings Institution and American Enterprise institute,D.C.1996:17.
  • 7[4]Susan E Cozzens. Linking research to national goals: recent discussion in the United States[A]. Using BHasic Research: National Policies for Linking Basic Research with Socioeconomic Objectives in the USA, UK, The Netherlands, Germany and France. Occasional Paper of the Center for Research Policy[R]. University of Wollongong, March, 1995:3.
  • 8[5]Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U S House of Representatives. The future of the National Science Foundation[A]. Abert H Teich, Stephen D Nelson and Celia McEnaney. AAAA Science and Technology Policy Yearbook[R]. American Association for the Advancement of Sicence, 1994:185-189.
  • 9[6]C H Townes. Quantum Mechanics and surprise in development of technology[J]. Science, 1968, 159(3):816.
  • 10[7]C H Twornes. How the laser happened--adventures of a scientist[M]. Oxford University Press, 1999.

共引文献612

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部