期刊文献+

劳伦斯《白孔雀》的伦理思想分析

Analysis of Ethical Idea of The White Peacock by D.H.Lawrence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 劳伦斯的伦理思想是理解劳伦斯作品的基本出发点,而《白孔雀》作为他初登文坛之作就已经显露出了其伦理思想的最初萌芽。《白孔雀》叙述者的不可靠性使作品表面上显示出权威伦理立场的缺失,但同时通过“戏剧化叙述者”的叙述在深层次上为读者暗示出了一定的伦理立场,通过这隐含的伦理立场折射出了劳伦斯所关注的伦理问题及其对这一问题所进行的思考。这也正是《白孔雀》的伦理意义所在。 To read Lawrence' s works, we must understand his ethical idea at first. As his first novel, The White Peacock reveals the origin of his ethical idea. This paper starts with the analysis of the unreliable narrator, and so there is not a standard ethical position in the novel. Then the narration of so - called "theatrical narrator" implied a certain ethical position for readers. This certain ethical position reflects the ethical problem Lawrence focused on and his opinions on it. This is also the ethnical idea of The White Peacock.
作者 颜志伟
出处 《湖南第一师范学报》 2007年第2期116-118,122,共4页 Journal of First Teachers College of Hunan
关键词 劳伦斯 《白孔雀》 叙述者 戏剧化叙述者 伦理思想 D.H. Lawrence The White Peacock narrator theatrical-narrator ethical idea
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Wayne C. Booth, "Freedom of Interpretation: Bakhtin and the Challenge of Feminist Criticism" [A]. Critical Inquiry 9 [M]. September 1982.65.
  • 2[2]参见 R.S.Crane, The Languages of Criticism and the Structure of Poetry [M]. University of Toronto Press, 1953.
  • 3[3]Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious [M]. Ithaca: Cornea University Press, 1981.59.
  • 4[4]Wayne C. Booth, Rhetoric of Fiction[M]. the University of Chicago Press, 1983.388.
  • 5[5]E.D. Hirsch, The Aims of Interpretation [M]. the University of Chicago Press, 1976.8,92.
  • 6[6]Wayne C. Booth, Rhetoric of Fiction [M]. the University of Chicago Press, 1983,2 ed.. 397.

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部