论群体性纠纷的解决机制——美国集团诉讼的分析和借鉴被引量：105

On the Resolution Mechanism of Group Disputes

导出

摘要近年来,伴随着我国经济的高速发展和社会的转型,因证券欺诈、环境污染、产品责任等导致的大规模侵权行为以及由此引发的群体性纠纷呈不断上升之势。但由于种种原因,这些大规模侵权行为并未得到及时地制止,受害人的权益也缺乏有效的救济渠道。改变这种状况,除了通过多元化的社会综合治理等方式预防和化解群体纠纷外,结合中国国情,借鉴美国式的集团诉讼既是必要的,又是可行的。其对于促进人们接近司法,强化实体法的实施力度、迫使侵权方遵守公共政策等方面都具有重要的价值和功能。 In recent years, with the high-speed development of the economy of our country and transition of society, the extensive tort caused by securities fraud, environmental pollution, product liability, etc. and group disputes initiated from this keep rising constantly. But for various reasons, these extensive torts have not been prevented duly and there is no effective channel to protect the victim＇s fights and interests too. To change this kind of state, it is essential and feasible to draw lessons from the American class action on the basis of combining China＇ s actual conditions, besides preventing and solving group disputes through social comprehensive administration in pluralism, etc. It has important value and function for promoting people to access to justice, strengthening implementation of substantive law and forcing infringer to observe public policy, etc.

作者章武生

机构地区复旦大学法学院

出处《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期20-30,共11页 China Legal Science

基金美国福特基金会研究项目<解决群体纠纷的理论与实践>[项目批准号:10551035]资助

关键词集团诉讼退出制加入制借鉴

分类号 D971.2 [政治法律—法学] DD915.2 [政治法律]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1江伟主持.《<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>修改建议稿(第三稿)及立法理由》，人民法院出版社20D5年版，第134—135页.
2Rachael Mulheron, The class action in common law legal systems: a comparative perspective, Hart publishing, 2004, p53.
3[日]小岛武司陈刚.《诉讼制度改革的法理与实证》[M].法律出版社,2001年版.第2316-18页.
4[日]和田孝仁.《民事纠纷处理论》，第165—166页，刘荣军.《程序保障的理论视角》，法律出版社1999年版，第47页.
5[日]谷口安平王亚新刘荣军译.《程序的正义与诉讼》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1996年版.第10页.
6David L. Shapiro, class Actions: The Class as Party and Client, 73 Notre Dame L. Rev. 913,924 (1998).
7[美]Stephen N．Subrin等.《美国民事诉讼的真谛》，蔡彦敏、徐卉译，法律出版社2002年版，第200页.
8Ilana T. Buschkin, the viability of dass action Lawsuits in a globalized economy-Permitting foreign claimants to be members of dass action Lawsuits in the U.S. Federal courts, 90 Comell L. Rev. 1563.
9Deborah R. Hensler, Revisifig the monster: new myths and realities of class action and other large scale litigation, duke j. Of comp. & int'11 2001.
10Deborah R. Hensler and others,class action dilemmas pmsuing public goals for private gain, Rand Institute For Civil Justice ,1999.