期刊文献+

中美碰撞标准对比与分析 被引量:1

Contrast and Analysis of Chinese and American Crash Standards
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伴随着车速的不断提升,汽车的碰撞安全性已成为全球高度关注的问题。文章对中美两国汽车的正面碰撞标准、侧面碰撞标准以及给乘客带来的伤害差异进行了对比分析,从中可以认识到中国和美国标准的差距,指出中国汽车碰撞标准仍相对落后和宽松;同时考虑到我国和欧美国家人体体型和体质的差异,在伤害标准方面,我们应当继续坚持对欧美伤害标准有差异的参考。 Crash safety of vehicle has become more important than ever in the world with increasingly vehicle speed. Through the analysis of difference between Chinese and American frontal crash standard, lateral crash standard and people's injury standard, we know the gap between Chinese and American standard clearly. It is indicated that Chinese crash standard will still fall behind and not be very strict; meanwhile we shall still consider the difference between Chinese and American injury standard with regard to the difference between Chinese and American people body and constitutions.
出处 《天津汽车》 2007年第3期26-29,共4页 Tianjin AUTO
关键词 碰撞标准 正面碰撞 侧面碰撞 伤害标准 Crash standard Frontal crash Lateral crash Injury standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]Mertz HJ.,Hodgson VR.,Thomas LM.,et al."An Assessment of Compressive Neck Loads Under Injury-Producing Conditions,"Physician and Sports Medicine,6:95-106,1978.
  • 2[2]国家标准委员会.乘用车正面碰撞的乘员保护.北京:中国标准出版社,2004
  • 3[3]国家标准委员会.乘用车侧面碰撞的乘员保护.北京:中国标准出版社,2006
  • 4[4]Nyquist G.W.,Begman P.C.,King A.I.,et al."Correlation of Field Injuries and GM Hybrid Ⅲ Dummy Response for Lap-Shoulder Belt Restraint," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,102:487-493,1980.
  • 5[5]National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,"Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard",Washington,1971

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部