期刊文献+

轻中度骨性Ⅲ类错矫治后牙关系的PAR指数评价 被引量:2

Application of Peer Assessment Rating index in evaluation of occlusal outcome in orthodontic therapy with mild or moderate skeletal class III malocclusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较轻中度骨性Ⅲ类错畸形拔牙矫治和非拔牙矫治的牙矫治效果。方法测量80例矫治完成的轻中度骨性Ⅲ类错患者治疗前后模型的PAR指数,并进行比较。结果两组治疗前,牙齿错位、咬合关系和覆盖的PAR指数有显著性,P<0.05;2组治疗后,牙齿错位与中线差异有显著性,P<0.05;治疗前后PAR减少的百分率中,牙齿错位、咬合关系项目差异有显著性,P<0.05。结论PAR分值能反映错严重程度,拔牙病例的错主要在牙齿错位、覆盖、中线不调方面较非拔牙病例重。拔牙矫治更有利于牙齿错位的调整。 Objective To compare the outcomes of orthodontic treatment for mild or moderate skeletal Class III malocclusion using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index.Methods Eighty cases were evaluated. Pre-treatment and post-treatment study casts were assessed by the PAR Index. Results The extraction group had significantly higher initial PAR scores, with greater initial dental displacement, dento-occlusal and greater initial overjet, whereas the dental displacement and centerfine had statistical significance between the two groups after the treatment. The percentage reduction in dental displacement and dento-occlusal scores had statistical significance between the two groups. Conclusion The extraction cases showed more severe dental displacement, dento-occlusal and overjet. Extraction treatment is more efficient in correcting dental displacement abnormality.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2007年第6期298-299,共2页 Stomatology
关键词 骨性Ⅲ类错[牙合] PAR指数 拔牙/非拔牙 skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion PAR index extmction/nonextmction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Richmond S,Shaw WC,O'Brien KD,et al.The development of the PAR Index(Peer Assessment Rating):reliability and validity[J].Eur J Orthod,1992,14(2):125-139.
  • 2Richmond S,Shaw WC,Roberts CT,et al.The PAR index(peer assessment rating):methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards[J].Eur J Orthod,1992,14(3):180-187.
  • 3Buchana IB,Shaw WC,Richmond S,et al.A comparison ofthe reliability and validity of the PAR Index and Summers'Occlusal Index[J].Eur J Ortho,1993,15(1):27-31.
  • 4Onyeaso CO,BeGole EA.Orthodontic treatment-improvement and standards using the peer assessment rating index[J].Angle Othod,1996,76(2):260-264.
  • 5缪耀强,施熙嘉,刘从华.应用PAR指数对332例错畸形矫治结果的评估[J].口腔正畸学,2001,8(1):9-12. 被引量:13

二级参考文献8

  • 1Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT etal. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Methods to determine outcome of orthodontictreatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992,14:180-187.
  • 2Stricker G. Psychological issues pertaining to malocclusion. Am JOrthod1970,58:276-283.
  • 3徐宝华(主编).现代临床口腔正畸学.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1996:272-273.
  • 4O'Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing theprovision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England andWales. Br J Orthod 1993,20:25-35.
  • 5Fox NA. The first 100 cases: personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed bythe PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) index. Br Dent J 1993,174:290-297.
  • 6Buchanan IB, Russell JI, Clark JD. Practical application of the PAR in dex: anillustrative comparison of the outcome of treatment using two fixed appliance techniques.Br J Orthod 1996,23:351-357.
  • 7Birkeland K, Furevik J, Boe OE et al. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatmentchanges by the PAR index. Bur J Orthod 1997,19:279-288.
  • 8缪耀强,莫如昌,王传贵,刘从华.PAR指数在评估矫治结果中的临床应用[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1998,14(4):16-18. 被引量:23

共引文献12

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部