期刊文献+

SF-36在中国HIV感染者中应用的信度和效度 被引量:19

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF USING SHORT FORM 36 IN CHINESE HIV-INFECTED PEOPLE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨36条目简明量表(SF-36)在中国人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者中应用的信度和效度。[方法]用SF-36对344名HIV感染者进行调查,对结果进行统计分析。[结果]各个维度内部一致性性度较好,克朗巴赫α系数都大于0.7。重测信度系数有4个维度低于0.7,其中在躯体功能(PF)维度低于0.6。除了总体健康成维率为94.3%外,其他维度中各条目的成维成功率均为100%。SF-36的8个维度均可以区分HIV感染者及与其具有相似经济文化背景的普通农村居民。急性感染和无症状潜伏期的感染者,在8个维度的得分明显高于出现综合征和典型疾病期的病人。[结论]SF-36用于测量中国HIV感染者的生命质量时,具有可接受的信度和效度。 [Objective] To evaluate the reliability and validity of SF-36 in Chinese HIV-infected people. [ Methods] The reliability and validity of the SF-36 in 344 HIV-infected persons were tested. [ Results]The Cronbach's α coefficients ranged from 0.75 to 0.90. Test-retest correlation coefficients ranged from 0.54 to 0180 ("Physical functioning" to "vitality") for the eight domains and there were coefficients less than 0.7 for four domains. The sealing success rate were 100% for all domains except for the domain of general health (94.3%) . The patients in later course of HIV infection expressed worse quality of life for all eight domains. SF-36 could distinguish the HIV-infected people and general rural residents in all domains. [ Conclusion ] There are acceptable reliability and validity of SF-36 in Chinese HIV-infeeted people.
出处 《现代预防医学》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第13期2410-2412,2415,共4页 Modern Preventive Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(30571594) 湖北省黄石市科委基金(2005A126)
关键词 SF-36 HIV 信度 效度 SF-36 HIV Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ware JE,Sherbourne CD.The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36).Ⅰ.Conceptual framework and item selection[J].Med Care,1992,30 (6):473-483.
  • 2Ware JE,Keller SD,Gandek B,et al.Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires.Methods from the IQOLA project.International Quality of Life Assessment[J].Int J Technol Assess HealthCare,1995,11 (3):525-551.
  • 3刘朝杰,李宁秀,任晓晖,李俊,张骏,孙丁.36条目简明量表在中国人群中的适用性研究[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):39-42. 被引量:311
  • 4何朝阳,和丽梅,李梅华.应用SF-36量表测定中国云南和泰国南部肺结核患者效果分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(3):187-189. 被引量:10
  • 5李宁秀,刘朝杰,李俊,任晓晖.四川省城乡居民SF-36评价参考值[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):43-47. 被引量:396
  • 6张骏,何廷尉,罗德儒,刘朝杰,陈芙君,袁鸿江.SF-36评价中风患者生命质量的信度和效度[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10(5):416-419. 被引量:58
  • 7Tate D,Paul RH,Flanigan TP,et al.The Impact of Apathy and Depression on Quality of Life in Patients Infected with HIV[J].AIDS Patient Care & Stds,2003,17 (3):115-120.
  • 8Burgoyne R,Saunders D.Quality of life among urban Canadian HIV/AIDS clinic outpatients[J].AIDS Patient Care & Stds,2001,12 (8):505-512.
  • 9Hsiung PC,Fang CT,Chang YY,et al.Comparison of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 in patients with HIV infection[J].Qual Life Res,2005,14 (1):141-150.
  • 10Mrus JM,Williams PL,Tsevat J,et al.Gender differences in health-related quality of life in patients with HIV/AIDS[J].Qual Life Res,2005,14 (2):479-491.

二级参考文献17

  • 1肖水源.社会支持评定量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7:42-42.
  • 2国家统计局人口与就业司.中国人口统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1997.4-6.
  • 3国家统计局人口与就业司,中国人口统计年鉴,1997年,4页
  • 4袁鸿江,老年医学,1995年,52页
  • 5肖水源,中国心理卫生杂志,1993年,7卷,增刊,42页
  • 6Johnson JR, Temple R. Food and drug administration requirements for approval of new anti-cancer drugs. Cancer Treat Rep, 1985,69:1155-1157.
  • 7Krittayaphong R, Bhuripanyo K, Raungratanaamporn O, et al.Reliability of Thai version of SF36 questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life in Cardiac patients. J Med Assoc Thai, 2000,83supple 2:130-136.
  • 8Ren XS, Amick B, Zhou L, et al. Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 health survey in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998, 51:1129-1138.
  • 9Failde I, Ramos I. Validity and reliability of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in-patients with coronary artery disease. J Clin Epidemiol, 2000, 53:359-365.
  • 10Tuberculosis Division Department of Communicable Disease Control of Ministry of Public Health. Battle Against TB-National Tuberculosis Programme Thailand, Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand, Limited, 1999. 23-47.

共引文献703

同被引文献215

引证文献19

二级引证文献205

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部