期刊文献+

两种消毒液对口腔印模的消毒效果及尺寸稳定性影响的研究 被引量:8

Influence of two disinfectants on disinfection efficiency and dimensional stability of dental impression
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨两种消毒液对口腔科印模灭菌的效果及尺寸稳定性的影响。方法分别采用2%戊二醛消毒液和含氯消毒液对实验室污染了细菌悬液的不可逆水胶体印模和硅橡胶印模试件进行浸泡消毒处理,蒸馏水浸泡作为阳性对照,每组12个样本。对处理后的口腔印模进行消毒效果检测。采用上述两种消毒液对不可逆水胶体印模和硅橡胶印模进行浸泡消毒处理,印模不浸泡作为对照,灌制超硬石膏模型,测量模型的尺寸稳定性,每组8个样本。结果2%戊二醛消毒液和含氯消毒液浸泡消毒20min,对不可逆性水胶体印模及硅橡胶印模均可起到有效的灭菌作用。与对照组相比,2%戊二醛消毒液浸泡消毒20min对不可逆性水胶体印模和硅橡胶印模的尺寸稳定性均无显著影响(P>0.05),而含氯消毒液浸泡消毒20min对不可逆性水胶体印模的左上中切牙-左上尖牙(B1-B3)宽度及B3颈部唇舌径均有影响(P<0.01),对硅橡胶印模的B1-B3宽度有影响(P<0.01),对B3颈部唇舌径无显著影响(P>0.05)。结论2%戊二醛消毒液浸泡消毒20min可用于临床口腔印模的消毒处理。 Objective To investigate the influence of chemical disinfectants on disinfection efficiency and dimensional stability of dental impressions. Methods 2% acid glutaraldehyde solution and chlorinous disinfectant solution were used to disinfect the irreversible hydrocolloid and silicone impressions, Impressions were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and Streptococcus. Those placed in sterile water were used as a control. The colony forming units were counted and antibacterial effects were analyzed. The irreversible hydrocolloid and silicone impressions immersed in 2% acid glutaraldehyde solution and chlorinous disinfectant solution for 20 minutes were poured to dental stone models,and the dimensional stability were analyzed. Results The efficiency of killing Staphylococcus aureus and streptococcus on irreversible hydrocolloid and silicone impressions exposed to 2% acid glutaraldehyde solution and chlorinous disinfectant solution in 20 minutes was more than 99.9%. Chlorinous disinfectant solution might influence the dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid and silicone impressions. Conclusions 2% acid glutaraldehyde solution could be used to disinfect the dental impressions.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第7期581-583,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 牙科印模技术 牙科消毒剂 灭菌 Dental impression technique Dental disinfectants Sterilization
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1.消毒技术规范.[S].中华人民共和国卫生部,2002..
  • 2Leonard DL, Charlton DG. Performance of high - speed dental handpieces. J Am Dent Assoc, 1999,130:1301 - 11.
  • 3Groschel D.Joumal of Hospital Infection,1981,2:295.
  • 4Hand- Kristian Andersen, Nils- Erik Finehn,Tovel Larsen. Effect of steam sterilization inside the turbine chambers of dental turbines.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Radiol Endod, 1999,87:184 - 7.
  • 5Vesley D, Melsin J, Stanley P. Microbial bioburden in endoscope reprocessing and an in - use evaluation of the high - level disinfection capabilitics of Cidex PA. Gastroenterol- Nurs, 1999,22(2):63.
  • 6Kovacs BJ,Chen YK, Kettering J D, et al. High- level disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes:are current guidelines adequate? AM J Gastroenterol, 1999,94(6): 1546.
  • 7Gerevich 1, Dubin R, Cunha B. Dental instrument and device sterilization and disinfection practices. J Hosp Infect, 1996,32: 295.
  • 8Worthington L,Martin MV.An investingation of effect of repeated autoclaving on the speed of some dental turbines in general dental practice. J Dent, 1998,26( 1 ): 75 - 7.
  • 9Leonard DL, Charlton DG. Performance of hight - speed dental handpieces subjected to simulated clinical use and sterlization.J Am Dent Assoc, 1999,130(9): 1301 - 11.
  • 10Blair FM, Wassell RW. A survey of the methods of disinfection of dental impressions used in dental hospitals in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J. 1996,180(10):369-75.

共引文献36

同被引文献100

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部