期刊文献+

李约瑟之谜、韦伯疑问和中国的奇迹——自宋以来的长期经济发展 被引量:151

Needham Puzzle, Weber Question and China's Miracle:Long Term Performance since the Song Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 技术的不断创新是一个国家经济持续增长的基础。工业革命以前,中国由于人口众多,在以经验为基础的技术发明方式方面占有优势,这是其经济长期领先于西方的主要原因。之后,由于科举制度的阻碍而未能及时实现向以科学与实验为基础的发明方式的转变,中国和西方的技术、经济差距迅速扩大。为赶超发达国家,新中国选择了违反当时要素禀赋结构所决定的比较优势的发展战略,试图在资本极端稀缺的条件下优先发展资本密集型重工业,导致优先发展部门中的企业在开放竞争的市场中缺乏自生能力,并以价格扭曲、资源计划配置等来保护补贴这些企业,资源配置效率低下。自改革开放以来,中国经济取得了奇迹般的快速增长,然而双轨制的渐进改革使得原有计划体制和市场体制之间出现某些制度的不配套,导致经济的周期波动、金融体系的脆弱以及收入分配的恶化等诸多问题。只有完成传统赶超部门内缺乏自生能力企业的改革,消除计划体制中各种制度扭曲存在的原因,中国才能全面完成向市场经济的过渡,并充分利用后发优势使经济在未来较长时期内实现又好又快的发展。 The continuous innovation is the key for a sustained economic growth for a country. Before the industrial revolution, due to her large population, China had advantages in experienced-based technological innovations, which is the main reason that China was more developed than western countries in the pre-modem times. Thereafter, because of the impediment of civil-service examination system, China failed to realize the transformation towards the science-cum-experiment-based technological innovations, so its technology and economy was quickly lagged behind western countries. After the founding of PRC, in order to overtake the developed countries and develop advanced capital-intensive industries first, China chose to adopt a development strategy that was inconsistent with its comparative advantages determined by its endowment structure at that time. As a result, the enterprises in these industries lacked viability in a free open market, and the government adopted the planned system to develop the non-viable enterprises. The efficiency of resource allocation was low. Since the beginning of reform and opendoor policy, China has achieved miraculous economic growth. However, its dual-track gradual reform approach has led to incompatibility between traditional planned economic system and market economic system, which has resulted in many problems such as cyclic economic fluctuations, the fragile financial system and deteriorating income disparities. Only through completing the reform of nonviable enterprises in traditional industries that were comparative-advantage-defying and eliminating the roots of all kinds of institutional distortions in planned economic system, would China be able to accomplish its transition to market economy, to fully make use of its advantages of backwardness, and to maintain its economic growth both healthy and fast in the long future.
作者 林毅夫
出处 《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期5-22,共18页 Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 技术创新 科举考试制度 比较优势 自生能力 后发优势 technological innovation civil-service examination system comparative advantage viability advantage of backwardness
  • 相关文献

参考文献82

  • 1Amsden, Alice Hoffenberg. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization [ M ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • 2Balazs, Stefan. Beitrage zur Wirtschaftsgeschichte der T' ang - Zeit (618--906), Mitteilungen des Seminars fur Orientalische Sprachen zu Berlin [ M ]; Jahrgang xxxiv. Berlin : Gedruckt in der Reichsdruckerei, 1931.
  • 3Balcerowicz, Leszek. Common Fallacies in the Debate on the Transition to a Market Economy [ J]. Economic Policy. Vol. 9, Issue 19 (1994, supplement).
  • 4Brada, Jose1 C. and King, Arthur E. Sequencing Measures for the Transformation of Socialist Economies to Capitalism: Is There a J-Curve for Economic Reform? [M] .Research Papers Series, No. 13. Washington, D. C. : Socialist Economies Reform Unit, World Bank, 1991.
  • 5Brada, Josel C., King, A.E. and Ma, C.Y. Industrial Economics of the Transition: Determinants of Enterprise Efficiency in Czechoslovakia and Hungary [ J]. Oxford Economic Papers. Vol. 49 . 1997.
  • 6Buck, John Losslng. Land Utilization in China: a study of 16,786 farms in 168 localities, and 38,256 farm families in twenty-two provinces in China[ M ], 1929- 1933. New York : Paragon Book Reprint Corp., c1964. First edition published by the University of Nanking, 1937.
  • 7Cameron, Rondo E. A Concise Economic History of the World: from Paleolithic Times to the Present [ M ]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • 8Chao, Kang. Man and Land in Chinese History: An Economic Analysis [ M ]. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1986.
  • 9Chenery, Hollis B. et al. Patterns of Development, 1950 - 1970 [ M]. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 1988.
  • 10Chow, Gregory C. Challenges of China' s Economic System for Economic Theory [ J]. American Economic Review. Vol. 87, No. 2 .1997.

共引文献7

同被引文献1708

引证文献151

二级引证文献1029

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部