摘要
张家山汉简的出土证实了汉初的确存在过以爵位高下及身份不同授予相应田宅的制度,即名田宅制。这套制度由于缺乏应有条件的支持,一开始就没有彻底施行,高祖后期即名存实亡。《二年律令.户律》是奉“高祖之法”不敢删削而原封保留,而非现行律文。武帝朝所纠劾地方豪右的“田宅逾制”,是武帝本朝的限田之制,不是汉初的“名田宅制”。此后,汉代的限田方案都没有成功实施过。常见诸史书的“田宅逾制”、“逾限”等提法,应大多为观念性词语,而非特指或实指。
It is confirmed by Zhangjiashan bamboo slips that there did exist a farmhouse system that was decided by the rank and identity in the Han Dynasty, The system had not heen put in force drastically at first hecause of the lack of strong support. It existed in name only at the end of Emperor Gaozu＇s reign. Househood Law in Two Years Law was not the law in practice but the order of Emperor Gaozu in fact. The despots＇ crime of having too many farmhouses in the period of Emperor Wudi was not the system of Ming-tian-zhai at the beginning of the Han Dynasty. From that time on, the project of limiting land had not been brought into effect. The terms , such as having too many farmehouses or exceeding the standard, were only idealogical terms without any practical meaning.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第1期32-37,共6页
Journal of Historical Science
关键词
名田宅制
田宅逾制
授田宅
私田宅
the system of Ming-tian-zhai
exceeding the standard of the farmhouse system
giving farmhouses by govern- ment
private farmhouses
