期刊文献+

NERD患者埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利与加强生活方式干预对照研究112例 被引量:2

Efficacy of esomeprazole,mosapride and lifestyle enhancement in the treatment of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: an analysis of 58 cases and comparative study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨NERD患者在埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗的基础上,介入加强生活方式干预的疗效.方法:112例NERD患者分为对照组(n=54)和试验组(n=58).所有病例均采用埃索美拉唑(40 mg,qd)联合莫沙必利(5 mg,tid)治疗8 wk,实验组同时进行加强干预治疗,如生活方式调整、饮食调整、心理干预及运动调养等.采用X^2检验比较两组疗效.结果:实验组58例中显效42例,有效12例,无效4例,总有效率93.10%(54/58);对照组54例中显效26例,有效18例,无效10例,总有效率81.84%(44/54).两组比较具有显著的差异性(X^2=7.39,P<0.01).结论:在药物治疗控制症状的基础上,积极介入生活方式干预,加强了医患之间的沟通,能提高患者的依从性,可更有效地改善NERD患者的临床症状. AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of lifestyle enhancement on patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) based on the combined treatment of esomeprazole and mosapride.METHODS: A total of 112 NERD patients were divided into control group (n = 54) and test group (n = 58). All the patients were given esomeprazole (40 rag, qd) and mosapride (5 rag, tid) for 8 weeks. Besides, the lifestyle in test group was enhanced (adjusting lifestyle, diet, mental status and movement intensity). Chisquare test was conducted to compare the efficacy between the two groups. RESULTS: In the test group, notable efficacy was found in 42 cases, effectivity in 12 cases, and inefficacy in 4 cases and the total effective rate was 93.10% (54/58). In the control group,notable efficacy was observed in 26 cases, effectivity in 18 cases, and inefficacy in 10 cases are ineffective, and the total effective rate was 81.84% (44/54). There was significant difference between the two groups (2 = 7.39, P〈0.01). CONCLUSION: On the basis of treatment by esomeprazole and mosapride, lifestyle enhancement can improve the compliance and clinical symptoms of NERD patients.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第14期1650-1653,共4页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 非糜烂性胃食管反流病 埃索美拉唑 莫沙 NERD Esomeprazole Mosapride Life-style enhancement
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献47

  • 1高萍.携带式食管、胃24小时pH动态监测[J].国外医学(内科学分册),1995,22(4):164-166. 被引量:6
  • 2钟英强,许哲,于钟,张世能,朱兆华.雷贝拉唑对不同类型胃食管反流病疗效和食管黏膜环氧化酶2的影响[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2006,25(4):255-259. 被引量:20
  • 3Marcinkiewiez M, Han K, Zbroch T, et al. The potential role of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier components in the maintenance of integrity of the esophageal mucosa in patients with endoseopically negative gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol, 2000,95 ( 7 ) : 1652-1660.
  • 4Johnson LF, DeMeester TR.Twenty-four pH monitoring of the distal esophagus:a quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.Am J Gastroenterol, 1974,62 : 325.
  • 5Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al.The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology, 1996,111 ( 1 ) : 85-92.
  • 6劭令方 王其彰.新编食管外科学石家庄[M].河北科学技术出版社,2002.251-264.
  • 7Jaspersen D, Kulig M, Labenz J, et al. Prevalence of extra-oesophageal manifestations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an analysis based on the PmGERD study. Ailment Pharmacol Ther,2003,17(12) : 1515-1520.
  • 8黄峻 黄祖瑚.内科查房手册[M].江苏:科学技术出版社,2002.380.
  • 9Armstrong D. Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease[J]. Yale J Biol Med,1999,72(2-3):93-100.
  • 10张理义,解亚宁,陈春霞临床评定量表[M]//张理义.临床心理学.北京:人民军医出版社,2003:342-397.

共引文献941

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部