摘要
20世纪80年代以来,对廖平经学思想的研究在前人的基础上取得了可喜的成果。对廖平经学思想的研究主要集中在对廖平经学六变的学术道路及其变因的研究上。在这方面取得了一些共识,但也有一些不同的观点。另外,关于廖平和康有为经学思想师承关系的研究也是一个热点问题。在这方面出现的研究成果使这一问题越来越明朗,但真正解决仍需时日。只有从社会历史发展的时代特征与学术主体的思想相结合的角度来重新评价廖平的经学思想,我们对廖平的经学思想的认识才会更为客观和全面。
Gratifying achievement has been made in the research on Liao Ping＇s thought about the study of Confucian classics since the 1980s on the basis of former research results. The relevant research has mainly concentrated on Liao Ping＇s academic road and the causes for his six changes in the study of Confucian classics. There are some common understandings in this respect, but different views also exist. In addition, the research on the relation between Liao Ping and Kang Youwei＇s thought about the study of Confucian classics has also become a heated issue. The research results in this respect are clarifying the issue, but it still needs time to get it finally settled. The research on Liao Ping＇s thought about the study of Confucian classics teaches us that, to reappraise Liao Ping＇s thought, we must combine the characteristics of the social and historical development with the thought of the academic subject before we could become more objective and more comprehensive in understanding Liao Ping＇s thought about the study of Confucian classics.
出处
《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期28-32,共5页
Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
廖平
经学思想
经学六变
康有为
Liao Ping
Thought about the study of Confucian classics
Six changes in the study ofConfucian classics
Kang Youwei
