摘要
目的 研究认知应对策略、神经质和述情障碍的关系和作用机制。方法 采用多伦多述情障碍量表、认知情绪调节问卷和艾森克人格问卷的神经质分量表对345名大学生进行调查。结果 （1）述情障碍与灾难化（r=0.41）、责怪他人（r=0.23）和神经质（r=0.48）呈正相关,与积极评价（r=-0.37）和计划性（r=-0.33）呈负相关。（2）灾难化、积极评价以及计划性单独对感受辨认不能维度和外向性思维起预测作用,神经质独立于认知应对策略直接对感受辨认不能维度起预测作用,但对外向性思维既无预测作用也无调节作用;积极评价和灾难化认知对感受描述不能维度单独起预测作用;神经质不仅在感受描述不能中起独立预测作用,而且还可以与计划性发生交互作用。结论 神经质不仅可以单独对述情障碍某一维度起预测作用,也可作为中介变量在应对策略和述情障碍某一维度之间起作用。
Objective To explore the relationship of cognitive coping strategies, neurotieism and alexithmia, Methods Toronto alexithmia scale, neurotieism subseale of EPQ and cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire were used in 345 university students. Results Alexithmia was positively correlated with eatastrophizing, blame others and neurotieism , and negatively correlated with positive reappraisal and planning. Catastrophizing, positive reappraisal and planning were among the most valuable predictors of a difficulty identifying feelings and externally oriented eoguitive style. Neurotieism, independent of cognitive strategies, was a predictor to a difficulty identifying feelings and was neither predictor nor mediator for externally oriented cognitive style, positive reapprais- al and eatastrophizing were predictors of a difficulty describing feelings to others, while neurotieism functioned as mediator between planning and a difficulty describing feelings to others. Conclusion Neurotieism ,independent of eoguitive strategies, is a predictor for some dimension, and a mediator between cognitive strategies and some dimension of alexithmia.
出处
《中国行为医学科学》
CSCD
2007年第3期261-263,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词
述情障碍
认知应对
神经质
Alexithmia
Cognitive coping
Neurotieism
