摘要
目的:比较舒芬太尼与瑞芬太尼分别复合异丙酚用于静脉麻醉的临床效果。方法:选择ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级、择期行腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)病人40例,随机分为舒芬太尼组(SF)和瑞芬太尼组(R),每组20例。分别采用舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼为主诱导和维持麻醉,观察两组病人麻醉诱导及维持期血流动力学变化和苏醒期相关时间、质量以及术后疼痛情况。结果:舒芬太尼组麻醉术中循环较稳定,苏醒亦快,术后疼痛程度轻。结论:舒芬太尼复合异丙酚用于静脉麻醉比瑞芬太尼更优越、安全,苏醒质量更优良。
Objective：To compare the clinical effect of sufentanil and remifentanil combined with propofol respectively for intravenous anesthesia.Methods：Forty ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ patients scheduled for laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy（LAVH）,were randomly divided into two groups,with 20 cases in each group,The SF group was given sufentanil combined with propofol for the induced anesthesia and maintenance anesthesia,while the R group with remifentanil and propofol in the same way as the SF group,The items observed were hemodynamics during induction and maintenance,analepsia time,the quality of recovery from anesthesia and postoperative pain.Results： The SF group had more stabler perioperative hemodynamics,quick analepsia and less postoperative pain compared with those in the R group. Conclusion：Sufentanil combined with propofol was more safe and effective for intravenous anesthesia,which was superior to remifentanil and propofol.
出处
《现代医药卫生》
2007年第18期2700-2701,共2页
Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
关键词
静脉麻醉
瑞芬太尼
舒芬太尼
术后疼痛
Intravenous anesthesia
Remifentanil
Sufentanil
Postoperative pain
