摘要
目的比较目前司法实践中常用的眼损伤伤残评定标准。方法对目前司法实践中常用的工伤标准、交通标准、普通伤害标准三大标准中的眼损伤伤残条款的内容及附录的内容进行比较分析。结果三大标准中眼损伤伤残条款的设立有本质性区别,工伤标准宽泛,另外两个标准严格;工伤标准与普通伤害的标准较为严谨,而交通标准不够严谨;三种标准存在混乱、不科学之处,同一种损伤应用不同标准常评定为不同的伤残等级,同时与国际上的标准比较也已落后。结论眼损伤伤残标准中存在很多问题,急需修订并完善。
Objective To compare and investigate the criteria of impairment evaluation about eye injury. Methods The distill i tems, contents of these items and excursus of three criteria, Assessment and Gradation of Disability Caused by Work-related Injuries and Occupational Diseases （AGDCWIOD）, Assessment for Body Impairment of the Injured in Road Traffic Accident （ABIIRTA） and Assessment and Gradation of Impairment Caused by Trauma （AGICT）, commonly used in justice practice at present were compared. Results There were essential differences among three criteria. AGDCWIOD was loose, ABIIRTA and AGICT were strict. AGDCWIOD and AGICT were religious, ABOIIRTA was oversight and non religious. At the same time, there were differences be tween domestic and international criteria, and domestic criteria were behind the times. Conclusion There are many problems in the criteria of impairment evaluation about eye injury; related items need recension and consummation.
出处
《中国康复理论与实践》
CSCD
2007年第8期769-771,共3页
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词
眼损伤
伤残标准
国际功能
残疾和健康分类(ICF)
eye injury
criteria of impairment evaluation
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health （ICF）
