论共同但有区别的责任原则在国际环境法中的地位被引量：33

The Role of Common but Differentiated Principle In International Environmental Law

下载PDF

导出

摘要共同但有区别的责任原则在国际环境法上的地位一直存有争议,我国学者多认为该原则是国际环境法的基本原则,而国外的学者对此多存质疑。该原则在内容上有待澄清之处,在适用上有不统一性和有限性。所以对该原则的研究应该区分明确承认该原则的情况与没有明确承认该原则,而只是通过解释,认为体现了类似理念的情况。从国家实践来看,依据国际法渊源的理论,该原则尚未发展为习惯国际法规则,尽管如此,其存在仍有意义。 Since the principle of common but differentiated responsibility emerged into the domain of international environmental law, it has been adopted by several international environment instruments. However, contentions about its nature in international environmental law remain. Most Chinese scholars consider it as a binding principle in international environmental law, but many foreign scholars doubt it. The content of this principle, specially the standards of and reasons, is ambiguous. Its applications are inconsistent and rather limited. Therefore it is necessary to distinguish those practices adopting the CBDR principle from those that did not refer to the CBDR principle clearly. Based on the theory of the sources of international law, it is believed that the CBDR principle has not yet evolved into a customary international law. Nevertheless, it is still significant in international law.

作者边永民

机构地区对外经济贸易大学法学院

出处《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期9-16,共8页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基金国家社会科学基金项目<多边环境条约中的贸易措施研究>(批准号:07CFX048)

关键词共同但有区别的责任国际环境法 common but differentiated responsibility common but differentiated international environmental law

分类号 D996.9 [政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1杨兴.试论国际环境法的共同但有区别的责任原则[J].时代法学,2003,1(1):83-93. 被引量：26
2Anita Margrethe Halvorssen, Equality Among Unequals in International Environmental Law. Boulder, Westview Press,1999.
3See Christopher D. Stone, Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law. American Journal of International Law, vol. 98, pp. 276 -301 .
4Paul G. Harris, Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: The Kyoto Protocol and United States Policy. New York University Environmental Law Journal, vol. 7, pp. 27 -40.
5Rumu Sarkar, Critical Essay: Theoretical Foundations in Development Law: A Reconciliation of Opposites? Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, vol. 33, summer 2005, pp. 367 - 378.
6See Declaration of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, UN Doc. A/Conf. 151/5/Rev. 1,13 June 1992.
7See Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, UN Doc. A/Conf. 48/14, 16 June 1972.
8See P.G. Harris, Common but Differentiated Responsibility: The Kyoto Protocol and United States Policy. New York University Envirenmental Law Journal, vol. 7, 1999, p. 27.
9See Article 5, the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1987.
10See Ratification[ EB/OL], http ://ozone. unep. org/Treaties_and_Ratification/2006 - 5 - 31.