摘要
以融贯性作为检验法律真理的标准,是一种超越真理观上的绝对主义与相对主义立场的尝试。德沃金的法律解释思想以融贯论作为法律真理观,以罗尔斯的"反思性均衡"作为法律解释的方法,以信念之间、信念和经验之间的融贯性作为法律解释的标准,从而为"法律唯一正解"提供了哲学上的正当化根据。但是,原则之间的竞争与冲突是不容否定的事实,并不存在理想意义上的融贯;法官的类推解释只能达致局部融贯而无法形成整体融贯;法律的无穷解释使德沃金的解释理论陷入无法自拔的"明希豪森困境",这些理论上的难题使德沃金的法律真理图景成为一种虚假的幻相。
Dworkin contends that coherence is the standard of testing legal truth; his theory tries to transcend the disagreement between the absolutism and the relativism. Dworkin＇s legal hermeneutics is based on the methodology of the reflective equilibrium, and the standard of legal interpretation is the coherence among the conceptions and experience, so the theory of ＂single answer of jurisdiction＂ gains the justified basement from philosophy. However, the competitive principles denies the ideal coherence, the judicial method of analogue only can realize the area--specific coherence but not global coherence, and endless interpretation as a logical puzzle could not be resolved.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第5期84-92,共9页
Law and Social Development
关键词
法律真理
融贯
反思性均衡
法律解释
legal truth
coherence
the reflective equilibrium
legal interpretation
