期刊文献+

论资产证券化立法中的“安全港”条款 被引量:1

Study on Safe-harbor Provisions in Securitization Legislation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 资产证券化作为新兴的融资方式,得到了越来越多国家的采纳和运用。影响其有效性的最大问题,莫过于破产隔离能否真正实现,"安全港"条款正是为了真正保证资产已经从发起人转让给了特殊目的机构。安全港条款适用资产范围广泛,同时也有一些例外情形,它对保护资产证券化,提高交易确定性很有帮助,但也存在一些不足之处,该规定对我国的未来相关的司法以及立法具有指导作用。 Securitization, as a new type of capital-raising method which has the low cost as its main benefit among other priorities, claims its increasing populace all over the world. The major problem affecting its effectiveness is no more than the realisation of bankruptcy-remoteness of the Special Purpose Vehicle(SPV), while the safe-harbor provision is for the purpose of assuring that the securitized assets have been effectively transferred to the SPV and not subject to the bankruptcy estate of the originator. The provision which has a large scope of application and its exceptions, would be of great help to harbor securitization and improve its certainty, although with some flaws simultaneously. The author concludes that the safe-harbor provision would be of guiding effect to the interpretation of Chinese related legislation.
作者 甘勇
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2007年第5期685-689,共5页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词 资产证券化 “安全港”条款 中国相关立法 securitization safe-harbor provision Chinese related securitization legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1甘勇.美国资产证券化中若干法律问题研究[J].法学评论,2005,23(3):146-151. 被引量:14
  • 2Schwarcz,Steven L.The Impact of Bankruptcy Reform on True Sale Determination in Securitization Transactions[J].Fordham Journal of Financial Law,2002,(7).
  • 3甘勇.美国资产证券化构造之法律问题研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2004,17(2):225-228. 被引量:2
  • 4Jonathan C.Lipson.Enron,Asset Securitization and Bankruptcy Reform:Dead or Dormant?[J].Bankr.Law & Practise,2002,(11).
  • 5Luben,Stephen J.Beyond the True Sales:Securitization and Chapter[J].New York University Journal of Law & Business,2004,(1).

二级参考文献16

  • 1[1]Steven L. Schwarcz.The Alchemy of Asset Securitization[J].Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance.1994, (1): 134-140.
  • 2[2]Thomas W. Albrecht, Sarah J. Smith.Corporate Loan Securitization: Selected Legal and Regulatory Issues[J]. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law.1998,(8): 411-452.
  • 3[4]Joseph Jude Norton, Paul R. Spellman.Asset Securitization: International Financial and Legal Perspective[M]. London: Blackwell Publishers.1991.
  • 4[5]Robert D. Aicher, William J. Fellerhoff.Characterization of a Transfer of Receivables as a Sale or a Secured Loan upon Bankruptcy of the Transfer[J]. American Bankruptcy Law Journal.1991, (65): 181-212.
  • 5[6]Steaen L. Schwarcz.The Impact on Securitization of Revised UCC Article 9[J]. Chicago-Kent Law Review.1999,(74): 947-961.
  • 6[7]Spiro a. Bazinas.An International Legal Regime for Receivables Financing: UNCITRAL's Contribution[J]. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law.1998, (8): 315-330.
  • 7S.L. Schwarcz,"The Alchemy of Asset Smiritization", in Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance, Vol. 1 (1994),pp. 133- 134.
  • 8C.A. Hill, "Securitization: a Low - Cost Sweetener for Lemons", Washington University Law Quarterly, Vol. 74(1996), pp. 1086- 1090.
  • 9T.W. Albrecht& S. J. Smith, " Corporate Loan Securitization:Selected Legal and Regulatory Issues", Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, Vol. 8 (1998), pp. 411- 422.
  • 10P.R. Wood, Tide Finance, Derivatives, Securitization, Set-Off and Netting, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1995, pp.42 - 50.

共引文献14

同被引文献87

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部