期刊文献+

AVL血气分析仪pH值测定结果的可比性探讨 被引量:1

Comparative study on the pH result of AVL blood gas analyzer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对2台AVL血气分析仪pH值测定结果进行比对和偏倚评估,探讨pH值测定的可比性,为减少测定结果偏差提供实验数据。方法参考美国临床实验室标准化委员会(NCCLS)的EP9-A2文件,以AVL COMPACTⅢ血气分析仪、原装定标液和质控品组成系统为比较方法,AVL COMPACTⅡ为实验方法,计算实验方法(Y)与比较方法(X)之间的系统误差(SE),以美国临床实验室修正法规(CLIA′88)规定的室间质量评价允许误差1/2(0.02 pH值单位)为标准,判断不同仪器测定结果的可比性。结果在电极保养或更换电极(膜)后,偏差超范围标本由8.29%降为1.71%。结论用2台血气分析仪同时检测时,应及时进行保养和偏倚评估,保证检验结果的可比性,为临床提供最佳服务。 Objective To discuss the comparability of blood gas pH results of different detecting system by studying the bias estimation and comparison. Methods Following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards(NCCLS) document EP9-A2,the system with AVL COMPACT Ⅲ blood gas analyzer,intrinsic reagent and calibrator was used as comparison method and the AVL COMPACT Ⅱ as testing method.The standard error(SE) in two method was counted.The comparability of two systems was evaluated according to the half of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment 88(CLIA'88) standard(0.02 pH units). Results After the electrode was maintained or reinstalled,the error specimens decreased from 8.29% to 1.71%. Conclusions If the pH result are determined by two system,it is necessary to do method comparison and bias estimation.It will provide the best diagnostic service for the physicians.
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第5期542-544,共3页 Laboratory Medicine
基金 浙江省教育厅基金资助项目(20030797)
关键词 PH值 比对研究 定标 电极 pH result Comparative study Calibration Electrode
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1National Committee for Clinical laboratory Standards.Method comparison and bias estimation using patientsamples.Approved guideline[S].2rd ed.NCCLS EP9-A2.2002.
  • 2张秀明,庄俊华,徐宁,黄宪章,陈茶,尹一兵,梁伟雄.不同检测系统血清酶测定结果的偏倚评估与可比性研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(4):346-349. 被引量:137
  • 3ISO/IEC 17025.General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories[S].1999.

二级参考文献5

  • 1International Organization for Standardization.General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.ISO/IEC 17025,International Organization for Standardization,Geneva,1999.
  • 2The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples.Approved Guideline,Second Edition,EP9-A2,2002.
  • 3Siekmann L,Bonora R,Burtis CA,et al.IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C.International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.Part 7.Certification of four reference materials for the determination of enzymatic activity of gamma-glutamyltransferase,lactate dehydrogenase,alanine aminotransferase and creatine kinase accord.Clin Chem Lab Med,2002,40:739-745.
  • 4郭健,王清涛,童清,杨振华.血清酶测定标准化的实验研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2002,25(3):147-149. 被引量:42
  • 5王清涛,童清,郭健.血清酶测定结果可溯源性研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2003,26(12):761-763. 被引量:23

共引文献136

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部