期刊文献+

爱护佳手部皮肤消毒效果监测及评价 被引量:11

Monitoring and Evaluation of Sterilizing Effect of Avagard Surgery Washing Liquid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨4%爱护佳皮肤消毒剂消毒效果。方法将参加手术的医护人员按8个时段随机分成涂抹、未涂抹两组,每组50例;均采用4%爱护佳外科洗手液进行皮肤消毒;在消毒后,需再次涂抹0.5%爱护佳快速无水消毒洗手液于手部和前臂,为涂抹组;无需涂抹0.5%爱护佳快速无水消毒洗手液,为未涂抹组;两组均在消毒后即刻及术中1、2、3、4、5、6 h及6 h后分别进行手指采样培养,检测消毒效果。结果两组人员在各时段进行细菌学检测,菌落数均<5 CFU/cm2,手消毒效果均达到国家卫生部《消毒技术规范》标准,涂抹组与未涂抹组在各时段及总时段的培养结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论4%爱护佳皮肤消毒剂消毒效果可靠,无需再次涂抹0.5%爱护佳快速无水消毒洗手液,其抗菌作用可持续≥6 h,使用流程简便,并能降低手术成本,提高工作效率。 OBJECTIVE To investigate the sterilizing effect of Avagard surgery wasting liquid. METHODS All the staff on operation were divided into two groups at random, each no less than 50 persons. Both groups were sterilized by 4% Avagard surgery washing liquid, tn one group, hands and forearms were smeared by 0. 5% Avagard fast surgery washing liquid(smearing group), the other group was not smeared by 0.5% Avagard fast surgery washing liquid(no-smearing group). In both groups the samples were derived from fingers and cultured right after sterilization and at intervals of 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h and 6h during operation, and to investigate the sterilization effect. RESULTS The bacteriological detections of both groups in all times showed that the number of colony was〈5 CFU/cm^2 , the effect of sterilization reached the technical standard for sterilization of Ministry of Health. There were no statistical difference in the results of the cultures of smearing group and no-smearing group (P〉0. 05). CONCLUSIONS The results of the experiment show that 4% Avagard surgery washing liquid is reliable for its sterilizing effect and easy to use. The duration of antibacterial effect is no less than 6 hours, this method could reduce the cost of the operation and improve the efficiency of work.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第10期1247-1249,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 爱护佳洗手液 手部消毒 质量监测 效果评价 Avagard surgery washing liquid Hands sterilization Quality monitoring Effect evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1钟秀玲.现代医院感染护理学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1998.209-212.
  • 2[1]Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al.Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection,1999[J].Am J Infect Control, 1999, 27(2): 97-132.
  • 3[3]Association of Operating Room Nurses.Recommended practices for surgical hand scrubs[J].AORN J, 1999, 69(4): 842, 845-850.
  • 4[5]Boyce JM,Pittet D.Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings.Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force[J].Am J Infect Control, 2002, 30(8): S1-46.
  • 5[6]Zoutman D, McDonald S, Vethanayagan D.Total and attributable costs of surgical-wound infections at a Canadian tertiary-care center[J].Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1998, 19(4): 254-259.
  • 6[7]Cheng SM, Garcia M, Espin S, et al.Literature review and survey comparing surgical scrub techniques[J].AORN J, 2001, 74(2): 218, 221-224.
  • 7刘振生 金大鹏 等.医院感染管理学[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2000.3-5.
  • 8牛秀成,张树德,周素琴,林明月,师元庆.医务人员洗手技术与手再污染研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,1998,8(2):88-89. 被引量:476
  • 9胡晶,徐秀萍,栾湘宁,冯小玲.术必泰消毒液应用效果观察[J].中华医院感染学杂志,1998,8(3):170-170. 被引量:16
  • 10金玉辉.安尔碘用于手术野消毒的临床观察[J].中华护理杂志,1999,34(10):627-627. 被引量:9

共引文献117

同被引文献125

引证文献11

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部