期刊文献+

液化天然气泄漏扩散模型比较 被引量:26

Comparisons for LNG dispersion models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 重气扩散的SLAB、DEGADIS和Fluent模型被应用于LNG泄漏扩散实验的模拟过程中,以Coyote3和5为例,对各模型模拟的体积分数随时间的变化与实验值进行了对比,结果表明Fluent模拟的结果最为接近实验值,SLAB模拟结果次之,由于模拟假设风速和风向不变致使模拟结果没有实验结果所存在的频繁波动。文中最后对各模型的统计误差FB,MG,VG,MRSE,NMSE以及FAC2进行了计算,分析结果表明三类模型模拟的结果与实验值一致,但结果都偏高,相比较而言,Fluent的结果更准确。 This paper deals with the simulation of atmospheric cloud dispersion resulting from liquefied gas spills. Experimental data were taken from the Coyote series trials that involved large scale cryogenic natural gas release. The data were used for checking the validity of the results obtained through three models including SLAB, DEGADIS, and Fluent. Taking Coyote3 and 5 as examples, the results showed that the Fluent cede approximated gas concentration histories with a reasonably better agreement and predicted more correctly the behavior of gas cloud during dispersion compared with the other two models. The statistical treatment including FB, MG, VG, MRSE, NMSE and FAC2 revealed that all three models got acceptable results but they all over predicted and the Fluent cede demonstrated considerably better accuracy.
作者 黄琴 蒋军成
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS 2007年第5期3-6,共4页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑项目(编号:2006BAK01B03-3)资助
关键词 LNG 液化天然气 模拟 重气 模型 LNG liquefied natural gas simulation heavy gas model
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]U.S.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Emergency Management Washington,D.C.NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Office of Response and Restoration/Hazardous Materials Response Division Seattle,Washington.ALOHA(r) Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres USER'S MANUAL.2006,2
  • 2[2]Donald L.Ermak.USER'S MANUAL FOR SLAB:AN ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION MODEL FOR DENSER-THANAIR RELEASES[Abridged Version].Physics Department,Atmospheric and Geophysical Sciences Division University of California,Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore,California.1990,6
  • 3[4]I.V.KOVALETS and V.S.MADERICH.Numerical Simulation of Interaction of the Heavy Gas Cloud with the Atmospheric Surface Layer[J].Envirnmental Fluid Mechanics.2006,(6):313 ~ 340
  • 4[5]G.A.Melhem,S.Saraf,H.Ozog.Understand LNG Rapid Phase Transitions (RPT).ioMosaic Corporation,2006
  • 5[6]Anay Luketa-Hanlin,Ronald P.Koopman,Donald L.Ermak.On the application of computational fluid dynamics codes for liquefied natural gas dispersion[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials.2007,140(3):504~ 517
  • 6[7]Ronald P.Koopman,Donald L.Ermak.Review Lessons learned from LNG safety research[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials.2007,140(3):412 ~ 428
  • 7[9]Spyros Sklavounos,Fotis Rigas.Simulation of Coyote series trials-Part Ⅰ:CFD estimation of non-isothermal LNG releases and comparison with box-model predictions[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2006,(61):1434 ~ 1443
  • 8[10]D.W.HEINOLD,M.T.MILLS,K.C.TAKACS.DISCUSSION HAZARDOUS G.AS MODEL EVALUATION WITH FIELD OBSERVATIONS[J].Atmospheric Environment,1995,29(3):455 ~ 460
  • 9[11]Manju Mohan,Panwap T S,Singh M P.Development of dense gas dispersion model for emergency preparedness[J].Atmospheric Environment,1995,29(16):2076 ~ 2087

同被引文献253

引证文献26

二级引证文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部