期刊文献+

社会称许性对16PF测验因素结构的影响 被引量:5

The Influence of Social Desirability on the 16PF Factor Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用共同方法偏差控制法研究在应聘情境下,社会称许性(SD)因素是否存在于16PF测验的二级因素结构中,对人格测量产生影响,并探索SD对15个分量表的影响程度。结果表明:在应聘情境下,16PF的二级因素结构中存在SD因素,SD普遍对13个分量表有显著的影响,其中分量表C、Q4和G受到的影响较大,分量表A、E、F、M、NI、、Q1和Q2受到的影响较小。本研究为探索如何矫正SD对16PF人格测量的影响提供参考。 This study investigated whether the social desirability factor was in the 16PF second order structure for applicants with the technique of controlling common method biases, and how much SD influenced the 15 Personality subscales. The results were that SD existed in the 16PF second order structure and affected the measurement of personality. SD had the greatest influence on the subscales of C,Q4 and G, and the least influence on the subseales of A,E,F,M,N,I,Q1 and Q2. The result could provide information on how to control the effect of SD on the measurement of personality.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期1165-1168,1160,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 社会称许性 人格测量 二级因素结构 方法潜变量 social desirability, measurement of personality, second order structure, methods factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1李锋,李永娟,任婧,王二平.工业组织心理学中的社会称许性研究[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(3):455-461. 被引量:6
  • 2Ganster D C,Hennessey H W,Luthans F.Social desirability response effects:three alternative models.Academy of Management Journal,1983,26(2):321-331.
  • 3Ones D,Viswesvaran C,Reiss A D.Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection:the red herring.Journal of Applied Psychology,1996,81(6):660-679.
  • 4Ellingson J E,Sackett P R,Hough L M.Social desirability corrections in personality measurement:issues of applicant comparisonand construct validity.Journal of Applied Psychology,1999,84(2):155-166.
  • 5Mueller-Hanson R,Heggestad E D,Thornton III C.Faking and Selection:Considering the Use of Personality From Select-In and Select-Out Perspectives.Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88(2):348-355.
  • 6Schmit M J,Ryan A M.The Big Five in personnel selection Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations.Journal of Applied Psychology,1993,78(4):966-974.
  • 7Smith D B,Ellingson J E.Substance vs style:a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts.Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87(2):211-219.
  • 8Ellingson J E,Smith D B,Sackett P R.Investing the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure.Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86(1):122-133.
  • 9Marshall M B,Fruyt F D,Rolland J P et al.Socially Desirable Responding and the Factorial Stability of the NEO PI-R.Psychological Assessment,2005,17(3):379-384.
  • 10Williams L J,Anderson S E.An alterative approach to method effects by using latent-variable model:Applications in organizational behavior research.Journal of Applied Psychology,1994,79:323-331.

二级参考文献27

  • 1[1]Paulhus D L. Measurement and Control of Response Bias. In: Robinson J P, Shaver P R, Wrightsman L S ed. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1991
  • 2[2]Ganster D C, Hennessey H W, Luthans F. Social desirability response effects: three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26(2): 321~331
  • 3[3]Arnold H J, Feldman D C. Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. Academy of Management Journal, 1981,24(2): 377~383
  • 4[4]Zerbe W J, Paulhus D L. Social desirable responding in organizational behavior: a reconception. Academy of Management Review,1987, 12(2): 250~264
  • 5[5]Morgeson F P, Campion M A. Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology,1997, 82(5): 627~655
  • 6[6]Paulhus D L. Social Desirable Responding: The Evolution of a Construct. In Braun H, Wiley D E, & Jackson D N (Eds.), Personality and intellect, validity and values: Cross-cutting themes. New York: Guilford, 1999
  • 7[7]Paulhus D L. Two-component models of social desirable responding. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1984, 46(3):598~609
  • 8[8]Paulhus D L. Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In: Angleitner A, Wiggins J S ed. Personality assessment via questionnaires: current issues in theory and measure. New York: Spring-Verlag, 1986
  • 9[9]Barrick M R, Mount M K. Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996,81 (3): 261~272
  • 10[10]Gur R C., Sackeim H A. Self-deception: A concept in search of a phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37(2): 147~169

共引文献5

同被引文献102

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部