摘要
在新文学运动发生的初期,传统演义经历了向现代历史小说转变的过程。胡适经过和钱玄同争论,以文学革命者的身份首先提出了传统演义的性质与归属问题,他通过对西方现代小说文体观念的接受,重新定义了历史小说,并把演义归为通俗历史讲义,这样,胡适以断裂的方式实现了演义与历史小说的分离和转化。鲁迅从小说史的角度指出演义本身具有的悖论性质,不仅存在于传统演义中,而且也内在于现代历史小说里;演义作为现代历史小说的否定性力量,在对历史小说的"抵抗"中实现了向后者的转变,在这一过程中,鲁迅突出了历史小说的"自律性"特征。
Historical romance was transformed into historical novels in early New Literature Revolution. Hu Shih first put questions about historical romance by argument with Qian Xuan-tong, in which Hu Shih differentiated historical novels from historical using west moden theory and he regarded historical romance as the popular history. From history of novella Lu Xun found that historical romance had a paradox, which also existed in historical novels. As the negative force, historicalromance resisted to be modernized while it became historical novels at last. For this reason Lu Xun pointed out that historical novels had self-determination characteristic.
出处
《天津大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第5期466-469,共4页
Journal of Tianjin University：Social Sciences
关键词
演义
历史小说
现代转化
胡适
鲁迅
historical romance
historical novels
modernization
Hu Shih
Lu Xun
