摘要
新制度主义从交换关系出发,认为企业规模扩展的界限是企业的边际组织成本与市场的边际交易成本相等之点;而古典主义则从企业核心的生产功能出发,认为企业规模扩展的界限也就在于企业的边际协调收益与市场的边际协调收益相等之点。文章借鉴马克思的协作观对新制度主义企业理论进行了修补,并进而探究了体现协作系统这一企业本质的社会合理规模界限:企业的净边际协调收益与企业的净边际组织成本相等之点;同时,又借鉴马克思的异化观考察了企业组织发生异化后所衍生出来的收益转移效应以及相应企业规模。在此基础上,文章得出了两个基本结论:企业的现实规模通常要大于企业的社会合理规模;并且,随着企业形态偏离协作系统这一本质的程度不同,企业规模也存在明显的差异。
From the aspect of exchange, New-institutionalism believes that the firm＇s boundary is at the point where the margin firm-organize expense is equal to the margin market-exchange cost. However, from the aspect of production function, Classicalism believes that the firm＇s boundary is at the point where the margin firm-coordinate value is equal to the margin market-coordinate value. This paper makes an amendment for the firm theory of new-institutionalism based on the Marxism view of coordination, and points out that the social rational boundary of firm scale is at the point where the net margin organize-cost is equal to the net margin coordinate-value, which embodies the essence of firm. At the same time, it also discovers the proceeds-transfer effects, and analyzes the corresponding boundary based on the Marxism view of alienation. Finally, it concludes that： （1） the actual firm scale is often greater than the theoretical social rational firm scale; （2） there are obvious differences among firm scales.
出处
《财经研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第10期83-94,共12页
Journal of Finance and Economics
