期刊文献+

两类教材对初中生数学推理技能影响的比较研究 被引量:11

A Comparative Study on the Impact of Two Kinds of Textbooks on the Deductive Skills of Junior High School Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用两类教材的初中生的数学推理技能存在显著差异;使用两类教材的初中生的演绎推理技能存在显著差异;使用两类教材的初中生的合情推理技能没有显著差异。《标准》应坚持“演绎推理与合情推理并重”的思想;对推理能力的定位应更加明确。教材的编写要使形式和内容统一。在教学中要坚持演绎推理与合情推理并重的思想。 Significant differences exist in the mathematics reasoning skills and deductive reasoning skills of the students in junior high schools where two kinds of textbooks are used respectively. However, no significant difference is found in the plausible deductive skills of those students who used the two kinds of textbooks. The Curriculum Standard is supposed to insist on laying equal emphasis on developing students' deductive reasoning and plausible reasoning ability, thus the positioning of the skills should be made even clearer. The unity of form and content is crucial in the compilation of textbooks. Both deductive reasoning and plausible reasoning ability should be equally stressed in classroom teaching.
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第11期41-45,共5页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
关键词 课程改革 两类教材 推理技能 比较研究 curriculum reform two kinds of textbooks deductive skills comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1教育部.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)[S].,2001..
  • 2克鲁捷茨基.中小学数学能力心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社.1982.
  • 3郑毓信.数学课程改革2005:审视与展望[J].课程.教材.教法,2005,25(9):45-50. 被引量:14
  • 4涂荣豹,宋晓平.中国数学教学的若干特点[J].课程.教材.教法,2006,26(2):43-46. 被引量:34
  • 5Robert Reys. Assessing the Impact Standards-Based Middle Grades Mathematics Curriculum Materials on Student Achievement [J]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2003, 34 (1): 74--95.
  • 6张奠宙,过伯祥.数学方法论稿[M].上海:上海教育出版社.2000.

二级参考文献3

  • 1吕听听 诸建刚.探课改之路,索课改真谛—常州市数学课改工作回顾与思考[J].中学数学教育,2003,3.
  • 2[美]约翰·布兰斯幅特.人是如何学习的-大脑、心理、经验及学校[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002.38.
  • 3On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One [J]. Educational Researcher,1998, (27): 4--13.

共引文献74

同被引文献125

引证文献11

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部