期刊文献+

高氟区公众对氟牙症社会心理影响的评价 被引量:1

Evaluation of the public in an epidemic area about the psychosocial effects of fluorosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查高氟区不同人群对氟牙症可能造成的社会心理影响的评价。方法在高氟区河北省邢台市,调查35名口腔医生、30名口腔专业学生、36名非口腔专业学生、34名职员及30名领导对20张不同程度氟牙症照片的社会心理影响评价,分别包括7个不同社会心理方面的五度分法评价题。采用SPSS10.0进行统计分析。结果高氟区公众评价均值随氟牙症的加重而升高(2.27~4.71),氟牙症照片的严重程度与对应的社会心理评价之间均存在显著相关,Spearman相关系数为0.657~0.767。口腔医生的评价值低于其他人群。高氟区公众评价最显著的相关因素是氟牙症程度,偏相关系数均在0.7以上,评价者人口学特征也与评价结果相关。结论高氟区公众认为轻度及以下氟牙症不会对患者的社会心理状况造成明显影响,且公众评价结果与多种因素相关。 Objective To investigate the attitude of the public in the epidemic areas about the possible psychosocial effects of fluorosis.Methods In the epidemic area of Xingtai city in Hebei province, 35 dentists, 30 dental students, 36 college students in non-dental schools, 34 clerks and 30 leaders were selected to evaluate the possible psychosocial effects of 20 typical fluorosis photos. Each evaluator would answer 7 five-point questions according to each photo. SPSS10.0 software was used to analyze the data.Results The Mean of the evaluation score was going up with the increase of Dean's Index (DI) score, ranging from 2.27 to 4.71. Significant correlation was existed between the evaluation and the degree of fluorosis, which the correlated coefficient ranged from 0.657 and 0.767. The evaluation scores of dentists were lower than those of other evaluators. The evaluation scores of the public in fluorosis epidemic area were statistically associated with the degree of fluorosis, which the partial correlation coefficient was above 0.7. The demographic data of the evaluators was also correlated to the evaluation.Conclusion The public in fluorosis epidemic area considered that mild or less fluorosis could not cause evidence psychosocial effects, which was also correlated to many factors.
出处 《现代口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第4期417-419,共3页 Journal of Modern Stomatology
关键词 氟牙症 社会心理状况 评价 公众 Fluorosis Psychosocial status Evaluation The public
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Petersen PE.The World Health Report 2003:continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century-the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,2003,31(suppl.1):3-24.
  • 2World Health Organization.Fluorides and Oral Health.Report of a WHO Expert Committee on oral health status and fluoride use.WHO Technical Report Series 846.Geneva,World Health Organization,1994.
  • 3马景,陶跃华,乔淑田,章和平,梁索理,王海森,姚光俊,董振军,程溆,李桂云,师贵文.河北省南水北调饮水含氟量及化学成分的调查[J].中国地方病学杂志,2001,20(2):117-118. 被引量:2
  • 4McKnight CB,Levy SM,Cooper SE,et al.A pilot study of dental students' esthetic perceptions of computer-generated mild dental fluorosis compared to other conditions.J Public Health Dent,1999,59(1):18-23.
  • 5Edwards M,Macpherson LMD,Simmons DR,et al.An assessment of teenagers' perceptions of dental fluorosis using digital simulation and web-based testing.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,2005,33(4):298-306.
  • 6Sigurjons H,Cochran JA,Ketley CE,et al.Parental perception of fluorosis among 8-year-old children living in three communities in Iceland,Ireland and England.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,2004,32(suppl.1):34-38.
  • 7司燕,张博学,侯玉波,李靖,高学军.对河北邢台农村高氟区氟牙症患者社会心理状况的评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2005,40(5):416-419. 被引量:8
  • 8Whelton HP,Ketley CE,McSweeney F,et al.A review of fluorosis in the European Union:prevalence,risk factors and aesthetic issues.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,2004,32(Suppl 1):9-18.
  • 9Alkhatib MN,Holt R,Bedi R.Aesthetically objectionable fluorosis in the United Kingdom.Br Dent J,2004,197(6):325-328.
  • 10Clark DC,Berkowitz J.The influence of various fluoride exposures on the prevalence of esthetic problems resulting from dental fluorosis.J Public Health Dent,1997,57(3):144-149.

二级参考文献32

  • 1沈彦民,杨军英.广州芳村和香港自来水加氟到0.7mg/L的氟牙症调查[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1993,28(1):32-34. 被引量:1
  • 2汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,:202-209.
  • 3王征宇.症状自评量表(SCL-90)[J].上海精神医学,1984,4(2):67-68.
  • 4金华 吴文源.中国正常人SCL-90评定结果的初步分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1986,12(5):68-70.
  • 5赵敬忠 张造林 等.河北省地方性氟中毒流行规律的调查研究[J].中国地方病学杂志,1984,2(4):221-221.
  • 6Flanary CM, Barnwell CM, Alexander JM. Patient perceptions of orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod, 1985, 88:137-145.
  • 7Holman AR, Brumer S, Ware WW. The impact of interpersonal support on patient satisfaction with orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1995, 53: 1289-1297.
  • 8Pogrel MA, Scott P. Is it possible to identify the psychologically "bad risk" orthognathic surgery patients preoperatively? Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg, 1994,9:105-110.
  • 9Kiyak HA, McNeill RW, West RA, et al. Personality characteristics as predictors and sequelae of surgical and conventional orthodontics. Am J Orthod, 1986, 89:383-392.
  • 10Finlay PM, Atkinson JM, Moos KF. Orthognathic surgery: Patient expectations ; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1995, 33:9-14.

共引文献21

同被引文献28

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部