期刊文献+

替牙期安氏Ⅲ类错畸形治疗方法的探讨 被引量:5

Clinical study of treatment for Class Ⅲ malocclusion in mixed dentition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨替牙期安氏Ⅲ类错的治疗方法。方法选择替牙期安氏Ⅲ类错患者30例,据正中关系位X线头颅测位片的ANB角将其分为两个治疗组:0°<ANB<2°为导弓治疗组;-2°<ANB<0°为联合治疗组。两组病例均用改良导弓矫治器先将前牙反解除,联合组继续用前方牵引器治疗,并对治疗前后的头影测量结果进行了统计学分析。结果两组病例均去除了下颌功能性前伸因素。导弓组平均疗程为5.2个月,导弓矫治器治疗后,SNA平均增加0.5°,随访2年后有2例复发;联合组导弓矫治5.4个月,SNA平均增加0.5°,继续前方牵引平均5.6个月,建立前牙正常的覆覆盖和Ⅰ类磨牙关系,SNA增加1.65°,患者的凹面型均有不同程度的改善,追踪2年无复发。结论正确的决定治疗方案在替牙期安氏Ⅲ类错的诊治中十分重要。 Objective To investigate the treatment method of Class Ⅲ malocclusion in mixed dentition. Methods Thirty patients with Class Ⅲ malocclusion in mixed dentition were selected and divided into two groups according to ANB angle measured on the cephalograms, Removable appliance group(0° 〈 ANB 〈 2°) and combined treatment group (-2° 〈 ANB 〈 0°). At the initiation of the therapy, the two groups were both treated with modified removable appliance to correct anterior crossbite. The combined treatment group then continued with maxillary protractor. The results were analyzed statistically before and after treatment. Results Mandibular functional shift factor was removed in the two groups treated with removable appliance. The SNA increased by 0.5° 5.2 months after treatment in the removable appliance group. After two years follow-up, relapse was noted in two patients. In the combined treatment group ,the SNA increased by 0. 5° after treatment with removable appliance for 5.4 months, and normal overbite and overjet of anterior teeth and Class Ⅰ molar relationship were achieved after continued treatment with maxillary protraction for 5.6 months, and SNA increased by 1.65°, the concave profile of patients was improved and no relapse occured after two years follow-up. Conclusion To achieve good results, appropriate treatment design should be carefully chosen for patients with Class Ⅲ malocclusion in the mixed dentition.
出处 《北京口腔医学》 CAS 2007年第5期264-267,共4页 Beijing Journal of Stomatology
关键词 替牙期 错[牙合] 治疗 Mixed dentition Malocclusion Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1陈淑玲,闫红窈,张杰.采用FR—Ⅲ型矫治器治疗安氏Ⅲ类错[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1997,13(2):77-78. 被引量:25
  • 2Ucuncu N, Ucem TT, Yuksel S. Acomparison of chincap and maxillary protraction appliances in the treatment of skeletalClass Ⅲ malocclusiona.Eur J Orthod, 2000;22:43.
  • 3Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Hunt NP, et al. long-term application of chincup force altersthe morphology of the dolichofacial Class Ⅲ mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1999;116:610.
  • 4Deguchi T, McNamara JA. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup theraphy inClass Ⅲ patients. AmJ Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1999;115:175.
  • 5Graber LW. Chincap therapy for mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod,1977;72:23.
  • 6Rittuci R, Nanda R. The effect of chincap therapy on the growth and development ofthe cranial base and midface. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1986;90:475.
  • 7Alexander RG. The effects of tooth position and maxillofacial vertical growthduring treatment of scoliosis with the Milwaukee brace. Am J Orthod, 1966;52:161.
  • 8De Alba JA, Chaconas SJ, Caputo AA. Orthopedic effect of the extraoral chincupapplianceon the mandible. Am J Orthod, 1976;69:29.
  • 9Lu Yc-L, Tanne K, Hirano Y, et al. Craniofacial morphology of adolescent mandibularprognathism. Angle Orthod, 1993;63:277.
  • 10Wendell PD, Nanda R, Sakamoto T, et al. The effects of chin cup therapy on themandible: A longitudinal study. AmJ Orthod, 1985;87:265.

共引文献83

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部