期刊文献+

组织承诺理论及其研究新进展 被引量:21

The Theory of Organizational Commitment and It's Research Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 21世纪的管理是以人为中心的人本管理,如何处理好组织与员工的关系是管理的核心内容之一,而组织承诺就是探讨这种关系的重要课题。高组织承诺员工队伍是组织持续竞争优势的来源之一,提升员工组织承诺具有重要的战略和现实意义。组织承诺具有多维特性,不同维度的组织承诺具有独特的预测效力。人力资源实践对组织承诺存在显著影响,以往研究很少考虑人力资源实践系统对其整体组合效应及其作用过程机制的研究。从理性逻辑推理和研究成果而言,组织承诺对绩效具有较好预测力,其关系模式受到自主性等因素的缓冲作用。近期研究聚焦于组织承诺与相关概念间的区别,关注变革型领导对组织承诺的影响过程机制,聚焦于组织承诺与组织公民行为间的影响模式。上述研究成果,为深入分析组织承诺形成过程及采取相应的组织管理策略提供有益的参考。 Management in the 21st century is human-oriented, and how to deal with the relationship between the organization and employees is the core of management. Organizational commitment is an important topic for studying this relationship. Due to the downsizing resulting from organizational acquisition, merger and changes in the recent years, employees' organizational commitment is decreasing. Many studies suggest that employees with high organizational is one of the sources of the organization's sustainable competitive advantages, so it is very significant to enhance the employees' organizational commitment. A great number of studies show that organizational commitment has multiple dimensions, each with distinctive predicting effects. So far, it has not been significant in the dimensions' discriminate validity, so it is necessary to further study on the structural model of organizational commitment. Human resource management practices consisting of recruitment and selection, training and development,career management, compensation and motivation, and performance management, have significant effects on organizational commitment. But previous studies focused only on the effect of a single HRM practice on the organizational commitment and failed to examine the configuration effects of the overall HRM practices, nor about the process and effect mechanism of HRM practices. In view of rationally logical reasoning and theoretical findings, there is a clear causal relationship between organizational commitment and performance, and organizational commitment has better predicting effects on performance while this relationship is obviously moderated by autonomy, employees' level, and so on. Recently, researchers have focused on the differences between concepts of organizational commitment and organizational identity strength, organizational identification. The findings suggest that organizational commitment is distinctively different from those concepts and significantly different in predicting effects on various outcome variables. With the increasing importance of organizational commitment, researches considered the affecting patterns of transformational leadership on organizational commitment, and they found that psychological empowerment, structural distance were the mediators of transformational leadership influencing organizational commitment. Based on traditional classic researches, some researchers further explored antecedents and the process mechanism of organizational commitment influencing outcome variables, and improved it a lot. Some studies focused on the effect patterns of organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behavior. Their findings show that self-concept have moderating effects on the relationship. The above-mentioned findings can be available for use in further analyzing the formation process of organizational commitment and adopting corresponding organizational management strategies.
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2007年第6期90-98,共9页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70302011)
关键词 组织承诺 人力资源实践 绩效 过程机制 organizational commitment human resource management practices performance process mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Baruch,Y.The Rise and Fall of Organizational Commitment[J].Human Systems Management,1998,17:135-143.
  • 2Meyer,J.P.,Allen,N.J.A Three-Components Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment[J].Human Resource Management Review,1991,1(1):61-89.
  • 3Pfeffer,J.The Human Equation[M].Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1998.
  • 4Mowday,R.T.,Porter,L.W.,Dubin,R.Unit Performance,Situational Factors,and Employee Attitudes[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,1974,12(2):231-248.
  • 5O'Reilly,C.A.,Chatman,J.Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment:The Effects of Compliance,Identification,and Internationalization on Prosocial Behavior[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1986,71 (3):492-499.
  • 6Angle,H.L.,Perry,J.L.An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1981,26 (1):1-14.
  • 7Mayer,R.C.,Schoorman,F.D.Predicting Participation and Production Outcomes through a Two Dimensional Model of Organizational Commitment[J].Academy of Management Journal,1992,35 (3):671-684.
  • 8Penley,L.E.,Gould,S.Etzioni's Model of Organizational Involvement:A Perspective for Understanding Commitment to Organizations[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,1988,9 (1):43-59.
  • 9Price,J.Handbook of Organizational Measurement[J].International Journal of Manpower,1997,18 (4-6):303-558.
  • 10Dessler,G.How to Earn Your Employees' Commitment[J].Academy of Management Executive,1999,13(2):58-67.

二级参考文献9

  • 1张力为,梁展鹏.运动员的生活满意感:个人自尊与集体自尊的贡献[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):160-167. 被引量:104
  • 2凌文辁,张治灿,方俐洛.影响组织承诺的因素探讨[J].心理学报,2001,33(3):259-263. 被引量:132
  • 3Watson Wyatt.WorkUSA 2000-Employee commitment and the bottom line [EB/OL].http://www.watsonwyatt.com/research/printable.asp?id=W-304,2004-01-31.
  • 4Mathieu JE,Zajac DM.A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents,correlates and consequences of organizational commitment [J].Psychological Bulletin,1990,108(2):171-243.
  • 5Arthur JB.Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover [J].Academy of Management Journal,1994,37(3):670-687.
  • 6Huselid MA.The impact of human resource management practices on turnover,productivity,and corporate financial performance [J].Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(3):635-672.
  • 7Allen NJ,Meyer JP.Affective,continuance,and normative Commitment to the organization:an examination of construct validity [J].Journal of Vocational Behavior,1996,499(2):252-276.
  • 8王颖,李树茁.人力资源管理实践与企业绩效关系研究评述[J].科学学研究,2002,20(6):640-645. 被引量:43
  • 9颜杰华,仲进,柯恩.最佳雇主何以最佳?[J].哈佛商业评论,2003(05M):12-29. 被引量:5

共引文献10

同被引文献282

引证文献21

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部