1Scheerlinck T, Casteleyn PP. The design features of cemented femoral hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2006, 88:1409- 1418.
2Nelissen RG, Garling EH, Valstar ER. Influence of cement viscosity and cement mantle thickness on migration of the Exeter total hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20:521 -528.
3Collis DK, Mohler CG. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with es- sentially the same geometry. J Bone Joint Surg ( Am), 2002, 84 : 586 - 592.
4Valle AGD, Zoppi A, Peterson MGE, et al. A rough surface finish adversely affects the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem. Clin Orthop, 2005, (463) : 158 - 163.
5Engh CA, Culpepper WJ. Femoral fixation options in the 1990s, Femoral fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 1997, 20:771 - 773.
6Swanson TV. The tapered press fit total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20Supple :63 - 67.
7Bohm G, Lintner F, Auterith A, et al. Morphometric examination of straight, tapered titanium stems. Clin Orthop, 2001, (393) : 13 -24.
8Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Burkart BC, et al. Ingrowth surfaces: Plasma spray coating to titanium alloy hip replacement. Clin Orthop, 1994, (298):37-46.
9Deboer DK. Advantages of milling versus broaching the proximal femur. Orthopedics, 2005, 28Supple:1041 -1044.
10Sinha RK, Dungy DS, Yeon HB, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous -coated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2004, 86:1254-1261.
