期刊文献+

交易所大宗交易流动性折价研究——来自沪深交易所的经验证据 被引量:14

Liquidity Discount of Block Trading in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着证券市场规模的扩大及机构投资者规模的壮大,机构投资者对市场流动性的需求日益剧增,大宗交易制度是满足投资者流动性需求的制度性创新。由于大宗交易的数量较大,其交易价格有别于正常交易规模的价格。本文利用沪深交易所的大宗交易数据实证探讨大宗交易价格及其影响因素。研究结果表明,大部分大宗交易价格低于当日收盘价格,呈现流动性折价现象,折价率达到1.27%;研究还发现,折价水平还受交易数量、正常交易时间段股票流动性水平、市场流动性水平及股价波幅等因素影响。 With the development of market scale and institutional investors in China, liquidity is more of an issue of interest for institutional investors. Block trading is a systematic creation to meet the liquidity demand. For its huge volume, block trading is usually at discount. This paper is an empirical study of prices of block trading in China stock markets and the reasons behind. The study reveals that block trades are usually lower than closing prices of the day, with a liquidity discount at 1.27%. Discount rate is also affected by trading volume, liquidity in continuous trading period and stock price volatility.
作者 徐辉 廖士光
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第11期4-10,共7页 Securities Market Herald
关键词 大宗交易 流动性 流动性折价 block trading liquidity liquidity discount
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1刘宝强.配股承销黑幕登台,幕后交易到几时[N].新京报,2005年1月4日.
  • 2Amihud, Y., Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects [J], Journal of Financial Markets 5, 2002,31-56.
  • 3Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. Liquidity, asset prices and financia policy [J], Financial Analysts Journal 47 1991,56-66.
  • 4Bradley, M., Interfirm tender offers and the market for corporate control [J], Journal of Business 53, 1980, 345-376.
  • 5买忆媛,乔俊杰.大宗交易的交易成本[J].商业时代,2002(01A):20-21. 被引量:2
  • 6王霞.海外证券市场大宗交易制度研究[R].深圳证券交易所综合研究报告,2001.
  • 7徐信忠,黄张凯,刘寅,薛彤.大宗股权定价的实证检验[J].经济研究,2006,41(1):101-108. 被引量:48
  • 8朱玺.沪、深两市大宗交易制度研究[R].深圳证券交易所第六届会员单位、基金管理公司研究成果评选获奖论文,2003.
  • 9朱玺.沪、深两市大宗交易制度演进及市场交易特征[J].财经科学,2004(2):41-45. 被引量:19
  • 10左宏,严小平,彭政.股票大宗交易的交易价格研究[J].经济师,2005(10):134-135. 被引量:4

二级参考文献26

  • 1李志刚.大宗交易有利市场稳定[N].中国证券报,2002-2-27.
  • 2周松林.借助技术创新完善服务提高效率上证所有关人士就大宗交易技术问题答问[N].中国证券报,2003-8-20.
  • 3陈志武 熊鹏.[D].北京大学中国经济研究中心,2001.
  • 4Barclay, S. and C. Holderness, 1989, "Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations", Journal of Financial Economies, 25, 371-395.
  • 5Barclay, M. and C. Holderness, 1991, "Negotiated Block Trades and Corporate Control", Journal of Finance, 46, 861-878.
  • 6Barclay, M., C. Holderness, and D. Sheehan, 2003, "Private Placement and Managerial Entrenchment", Working Paper, University of Rochester.
  • 7Dyek, A. and L. Zingales, 2004, '+char(34)+'Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison'+char(34)+', Journal of Finance, 59, 537-600.
  • 8Kahl, M., Liu, J., and A. Longstaff, 2002, "Paper Milliolufires: How Valuable is Stock to a Stockholder Who is Restricted from Selling It?", Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 385-410.
  • 9La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1999, "Corporate Ownership around The World", Journal of Finance,54, 471-517.
  • 10Longstaff, A. 1995, "How Much Can Marketability Affect Security Values?", Journal of Finance, 50, 1767-1774.

共引文献64

同被引文献113

引证文献14

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部