期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术后直肠癌患者生活质量评价 被引量:6

Quality of life in patients with rectal cancer after laparoscopic colectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹腔镜手术后直肠癌患者生活质量。方法:本研究是前瞻性非随机观察研究。2004年9月至2005年12月间共51位直肠癌患者加入研究并接受了手术治疗,其中腹腔镜手术组23人,开腹手术组28人。以EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-CR38量表测定患者术前、出院时和术后3个月时的生活质量。结果:术前腹腔镜组患者角色功能(Role functioning)低于开腹组患者,但是腹腔镜组患者较少有经济困难,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但是没有临床意义。两组患者其余各领域评分均无差异(P>0.05)。两组患者术后各领域评分相当(P>0.05)。腹腔镜手术组患者只是在出院时的疼痛轻于开腹手术组患者,差异有统计学意义(U=218.5,P=0.042),但是没有临床意义。结论:与开腹手术比较,直肠癌腹腔镜手术只在术后短期内显示了有限的优势。腹腔镜手术对直肠癌患者生活质量影响的评价有待于进一步研究。 Objective: To assess the quality of life in patients with rectal cancer after laparoscopic colectomy. Methods: From Sep. 2004 to Dec. 2005,51 patients with rectal cancer were recruited in this prospective, non-randomized study. Twenty-three patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy (LC) ,28 patients had open colectomy (OC). EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ- CR38 questionnaire were applied to evaluate quality of life baseline,discharging and 3 months after operation. Results: Before operation,the median score of role functioning in LC group was lower. However,LC group patients complained less financial difficulties. The differences were of statistical significance (P〈 0. 05), hut not of clinical significance. The median scores of other function domains and symptom domains were similar between two groups (P 〉 0. 05). Postoperatively,the most median scores of function domains and symptom domains between two groups were similar (P〉0.05). The only score with statistically significant difference was the pain when patients left hospital (U = 218. 5, P = 0. 042). However, the difference was not of clinical significance, too. Conclusion: Only minimal benefits in short-term postoperative quality of life are found with laparoscopic colectomy in patients with rectal cancer compared with open colectomy.
出处 《浙江大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 2007年第4期371-377,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang University(Medical Sciences)
基金 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(X206953)
关键词 结直肠肿瘤/外科学 腹腔镜检查 前瞻性研究 生活质量 Colorectal neoplasms/surg Laparoscopy Prospective studies Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1JACOBS M,VERDEJA J C,GOLDSTEIN H S.Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy)[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc,1991,1(3):144-150.
  • 2BRAGA M,FRASSON M,VIGNALI A,et al.Laparoscopic vs.open colectomy in cancer patients:long-term complications,quality of life,and survival[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2005,48(12):2 217-2 223.
  • 3PSAILA J,BULLEY S H,EWINGS P,et al.Outcome following laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,1998,85(5):662-664.
  • 4MRC CLASICC TRIAL GROUP.Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopicassisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre,randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2005,365(9472):1 718-1 726.
  • 5CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF SURGICAL THERAPY STUDY GROUP.A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2004,350(20):2 050-2 059.
  • 6AARONSON N K,AHMEDZAI S,BERGMAN B,et al.The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30:a quality-oflife instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1993,85(5):365-376.
  • 7SPRANGERS M A,TE VELDE A,AARON-SON N K.The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38).European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life[J].Eur J Cancer,1999,35(2):238-247.
  • 8万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,汤学良,孟琼,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(4):353-355. 被引量:1317
  • 9FAYERS P M,AARONSON N K,BJORDAL K,et al.The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition)[M].Brussels:European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer,2001.
  • 10OSOBA D,RODRIGUES G,MYLES J,et al.Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores[J].J Clin Oncol,1998,16(1):139-144.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Johnson JR,Temple R. Food and drug administration requirements for approval of new anti-cancer drugs[J]. Cancer Treat Rep, 1985,69(10) : 1155-1157.
  • 2Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30:a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1993,85 (5) : 365-376.
  • 3Aaronson NK, Cull A, Kaasa S, et al. The EORTC modular approach to quality of life assessment in ontology [J]. Int J Ment Health, 1994,23 (4):75-96.

共引文献1316

同被引文献33

  • 1李军,丁克峰,张苏展.结直肠癌患者经腹腔镜手术后短期疗效和安全性的荟萃分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(35):2485-2490. 被引量:36
  • 2周光荣,刘卫东,赵耀,王泰岳,于仁,孙跃明.腹腔镜结肠直肠癌切除术[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(2):114-115. 被引量:3
  • 3Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP. Laparosc-opic versus open sur- gery for rectal cancer: ameta-analysis [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2006,13 (3) :413-424.
  • 4Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer[J]. Br J Surg,2002,89(12) :1551-1556.
  • 5Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al. Bladder and sexual function fol- lowing resectionfor rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of lapa- roscopic versus open technique [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2005,92 ( 9 ) : 1124- 1132.
  • 6邱红根,杨家英,朱晨宇,谢莉,朱耀明.传统直肠癌根治术对男性患者排尿和性功能的影响[J].临床外科杂志,2007,15(9):633-634. 被引量:3
  • 7于永扬,杨烈,周总光,李园,徐兵,刘海义,宋军民,蒋小.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除保肛术后生活质量评估[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(5):524-529. 被引量:34
  • 8Jemal A,Bray F,Center MM,et al. Global cancer statistics[ J ]. CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61(2) :69-90.
  • 9Jayne DG,Guillou PJ,Thorpe H,et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year resultsof the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007 ,25(21) :3061-3068.
  • 10Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R,et al. Survival after laparoscopic- surgeryversus open surgeiy for colon cancer:long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial[ J]. Lancet Oncol,2009,10( 1) :44-52.

引证文献6

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部