期刊文献+

胃和结直肠肿瘤脉管浸润特点及其临床意义的研究 被引量:2

Study of vessel invasion in gastrointestinal cancer and its clinical significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究胃和结直肠肿瘤血管浸润(BVI)和淋巴管浸润(LVI)的检测方法及其临床意义。方法:应用免疫组化法检测95例胃和结直肠肿瘤组织中CD34和D2-40的表达,根据HE染色和免疫组化染色结果判断BVI和LVI,并分析其临床意义。结果:淋巴管浸润与血管浸润显著相关,P<0.001。免疫组化法发现的脉管浸润显著高于HE法发现的脉管浸润,P<0.001。肿瘤浸润深度与BVI(1.5%vs33.3%,P<0.001)和LVI(7.7%vs40.0%,P<0.001)显著相关。淋巴结转移状态与BVI(6.9%vs26.1%,P=0.022)和LVI(6.9%vs52.2%,P<0.001)显著相关。结论:免疫组化法比常规HE法有更高的特异性和敏感性;BVI和LVI可能是胃癌和结直肠癌重要的预测预后因子。 OBJECTIVE: To explore the method of detecting blood vessel invasion (BVI) and lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) and the significance of BVI and LVI. METHODS: Expression of CD34 and D2-40 of 95 patients with gastrointestinal cancer were detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). BVI and LVI were detected by IHC and HE staining. RESULTS: BVI was correlated with LVI significantly, P〈0.001. IHC staining detected more vessel invasion than HE staining did, P〈0. 001. The depth of invasion of tumor was correlated significantly with BVI ( 1.5 % vs 33.3%, P〈0.001) and LVI (7.7% vs 40.0%, P〈0.001). The statues of lymph nodes was correlated significantly with BVI (6.9% vs 26.1%, P=0.022)and LVI (6.9% vs 52.2%, P〈 0. 001). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of IHC staining was higher than those of HE staining in detecting vessel invasion. BVI and LVI seem to be prognostic factors to gastrointestinal cancers.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2007年第23期1795-1797,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 胃肿瘤 结肠直肠肿瘤 肿瘤浸润 stomach neoplasms colorectal neoplasms neoplasm invasiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1van-den-Eynden G G, Van der Auwera I, Van Laere S J, et al. Distinguishing blood and lymph vessel invasion in breast cancer: a prospective immunohistochemical study[J]. Br J Cancer, 2006,94(11) :1643-1649.
  • 2Hyung W J, Lee J H, Choi S H, et al. Prognostic impact of lymphatic and/or blood vessel invasion in patients with nodenegative advanced gastric cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2002, 9(6) :562-567.
  • 3Gabbert H E, Meier S, Gerharz C D, et al. Incidence and prognostic significance of vascular invasion in 529 gastric-cancer patients[J]. Int J Cancer, 1991,49(2):203-207.
  • 4Liang P, Nakada I, Hong J W, et al. Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically detected blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in colorectal carcinoma: its impact on prognosis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007,14(2) :470-477.
  • 5Minsky B D, Mies C, Rich T A, et al. Lymphatic vessel invasion is an independent prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1989,17(2):311-318.
  • 6Evangelou E, Kyzas P A, Trikalinos T A. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of lymphatic endothelium markers: Bayesian approach[J]. Mod Pathol, 2005,18(11):1490-1497.
  • 7Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Tabachi K, et al. Evaluation of lymphatic invasion in primary gastric cancer by a new monoclonal antibody, D2-40[J]. Hum Pathol, 2006,37(9):1193-1199.

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部