期刊文献+

老年人重症肺部感染APACHE Ⅱ评分的临床价值 被引量:7

CLINICAL VALUE OF APACHE Ⅱ SCORE IN SEVERE PULMONARY INFECTION OF THE ELDERLY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]准确评估老年人重症肺部感染的危重程度及预后。[方法]对老年人重症肺部感染患者进行回顾性分析,采用急性生理改变与慢性健康评估系统(APACHEⅡ)对疾病的危重程度进行评分。[结果]全组APACHEⅡ评分均值为21.5分。57例死亡患者为24.4分,明显高于123例存活患者的18.1分(P﹤0.01)。经治疗5 d后,存活组评分明显下降,死亡组评分明显升高(P均﹤0.01)。随着APACHEⅡ评分增高,并发症发生率从7.1%升至80.0%;病死率从0逐渐升高至100.0%(P均﹤0.01)。[结论]APACHEⅡ评分系统是评估老年人重症肺部感染病情危重程度预后的较好指标,值得在临床工作中推广使用。 [Objective]To evaluate the severity and the prognosis of severe pulmonary infection in the elderly patients.[Methods]A retrospective study conducted in 180 elderly patients with severe pulmonary infection,the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)were used to quantify the severity of illness and to judge the outcome.[Results]The average APACHE Ⅱ score of these patients was 21.5.APACHE Ⅱ score showed a difference between the fatal patients(24.4)and survivors(18.1).After 5 days' treatment,the score of survivors descended obviously and the score of dead patients ascended(P﹤0.01).With the increase of APACHEⅡ score,the incidence of complication ascended from 7.1% to 80.0%,the mortality ascended gradually from 0 to 100.0%(P﹤0.01).[Conclusion]For severe pulmonary infection in the elderly patients,the system of APACHEⅡscore is value in predicting the outcome and estimaling the quality of life.
出处 《现代预防医学》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第23期4420-4421,共2页 Modern Preventive Medicine
基金 河南省医药卫生科研重点项目(03121)
关键词 肺部感染 老年人 预后 APACHEⅡ评分 Pulmonary infection Elderly patient Prognosis APACHE Ⅱ score
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献21

  • 1孙海晨,王代科,何双梧.外科感染性休克的严重度和预后的评估[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(5):290-291. 被引量:3
  • 2王今达,王宝恩.多脏器功能失常综合征(MODS)病情分期诊断及严重程度评分标准(经庐山’95全国危重病急救医学学术会讨论通过)[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):346-347. 被引量:1421
  • 3袁建章,汪得喜.从APACHE预测评分系统观察呼吸衰竭患者的临床特点[J].中国危重病急救医学,1997,9(4):227-229. 被引量:9
  • 4李以先.23例呼吸衰竭临床分析[J].医师进修杂志,1996,19:50-51.
  • 5Bernard G R,Artigas A,Brigham K L,et al.The American-European consensus conference on acute respiratory distress syndrome:definitions,mechanisms,relevant outcomes,and clinical trial coordination[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,1994,151:818.
  • 6Kalb P E,Miller D H.Utilization strategies for intensive care units [J].JAMA,1989,261:2389-2395.
  • 7Schneiderman L J,Jecker N S,Jonsen A R.Medical futility:its meaning and ethic al implications[J].Ann Inter Med,1990,112:948-954.
  • 8Markgraf R,Deutschinoff G,Pientka L,et al.Comparison of acute physiol ogy and chronic health evaluations Ⅱ and Ⅲ and simplified physiology score Ⅱ: a prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a Germ an interdisciplinary in
  • 9Knaus W A,Draper E A,Wagner D P,et al.APACHEⅡ:a severity of disease classification system[J].Crit Care Med,1985,13:818-829.
  • 10Knaus W A,Zimmerman J E,Wagner D P,et al.APACHEⅡ:a severity of disease classification system[J].Crit Care Med,1989,17 (Suppl):S169-S173.

共引文献50

同被引文献85

引证文献7

二级引证文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部